Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

Options
Pure int - pach/light/fire 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
Pure int - pach/light/force 75%  75%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:10 am 
Hi, I'm New Here
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Location:
Azteca
Which would be more fun...this will be just for fun so survivability isn't a real factor. Only those two or maybe some sort of dual wield build, int of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:27 am 
Regular Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 345
Location: some Pserver
int... get ice for snow shield, or you'll die horribly. So it'd be pach ice light, or pach ice fire, or fire and light mixed...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:53 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 124
Location: Sweden
pach/light/COLD

as an int pach you will need snow shield.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:37 pm 
New Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 48
Location: Beyond hell, above heaven and then two houses to the left.
Pach, light and fire kicks ass when you pass 40... WHy is it a must with snowshield? He wont die unless he shitalks to people or go pvp vs str or hybrid chars. ~.~

Pve is no problem, with light and fire you kill everything before it reaches you. With this build you have more firepower han you need. And distance will be the key. A gig is an easy kill. Pt mobs require more planning.. with kb, stun and shit it wont be a problem.

Snowshield is overrated and a waste of sp when it comes to pve.
And if the guy dont bot or aint a complete idiot, this will go fine.

Never tried the force build tought...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:54 pm 
Elite Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5985
Location: ...
Force makes everything interesting.

_________________
Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:03 pm 
Forum God
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13204
Location: Life
omier44 wrote:
Force makes everything interesting.

Cleric > Force.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:22 am 
Elite Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5985
Location: ...
Cleric is not INTERESTING... at all.

_________________
Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:30 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 828
Location:
Azteca
omier44 wrote:
Cleric is not INTERESTING... at all.

Objection....

Cleric is very interesting, at least for me. I love playing cleric in euro pts, it's one of the more challenging tasks in the pt. Also in group pvp it's a very nice and essential build too. A good cleric is very important in pt pvp.

Just because it's not interesting for you, it doesn't mean that it's not interesting for other people either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:34 pm 
Elite Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5985
Location: ...
Well, yea it is interesting in pt, but not in general imo.

_________________
Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:06 pm 
Forum Legend
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7150
Location: uefa2012
neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything

_________________
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO

Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:58 pm 
Elite Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5985
Location: ...
UnbeatableDevil wrote:
neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything

That is, if u don't know what to do.

_________________
Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:24 pm 
Forum Legend
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7150
Location: uefa2012
A int bow with no cold is pretty much a wizard/bard with less dmg and no pot delay

_________________
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO

Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:34 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 124
Location: Sweden
PACH/COLD/LIGHT

Since pacheon dosnt give you that much def, both light and cold are important. You need ice for snow shield, iceberg wall, ice rain, frost nova and the imbue and you need light for the grass and ghost walk and ofc the nukes.
Fire would prolly increase your DMG but what you need is defence.
And a good bow.

Cold imbue makes the pain go away.
Spoiler!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group