It's okay guys, we can just market it as "avant-garde" and it will fly off the shelves. The future will remember the great works of art the twentieth and twenty-first centuries produced. First No. 5, 1948 and now Noise.
i don't get it...
No. 5, 1948 by Jackson Pollock is the world's most expensive painting.
Here it is:
this is what artists call orderly disorder seriously, WTF
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 7885 Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.
To reply to the 'even my kid can do that' comment.
Your kid can't. You're being shallow. He expresses something with his work, tells a story with every drop, every color, and every switch in color. Pollock did things purely on feeling, and background.
It's more then just turning a bucket of paint over, and letting it all go.
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 5607 Location: darkroot garden
Priam wrote:
To reply to the 'even my kid can do that' comment.
Your kid can't. You're being shallow. He expresses something with his work, tells a story with every drop, every color, and every switch in color. Pollock did things purely on feeling, and background.
It's more then just turning a bucket of paint over, and letting it all go.
Looks like he just dipped his brush in his paint then flicked it on the canvas. But with feeling <.<
To reply to the 'even my kid can do that' comment.
Your kid can't. You're being shallow. He expresses something with his work, tells a story with every drop, every color, and every switch in color. Pollock did things purely on feeling, and background.
It's more then just turning a bucket of paint over, and letting it all go.
Looks like he just dipped his brush in his paint then flicked it on the canvas. But with feeling <.<
lol that's what i assumed ...but i'm no expert at art..so no flames for me
_________________ Kali -- 51 wizard/cleric Amumu -- 24 bard/cleric
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 5573 Location: Netherlands
Cruor wrote:
X-Lax wrote:
Cruor wrote:
It's okay guys, we can just market it as "avant-garde" and it will fly off the shelves. The future will remember the great works of art the twentieth and twenty-first centuries produced. First No. 5, 1948 and now Noise.
i don't get it...
No. 5, 1948 by Jackson Pollock is the world's most expensive painting.
Here it is: [img]
I think it's a wrong statement to say it's the world's most expensive painting. It was sold for the highest amount a painting has ever been sold, but the Mona Lisa for example is of far greater value.
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 9841 Location: US - Illidan
Priam wrote:
Jackson pollock was a pioneer. And he owns in that area, his own style.
Whether or not you like it, has always been the main thing with his paintings. Some people call it rubbish, other love it, like i do.
a pioneer....he literally dribbled paint on a canvas....not only can any 3 year old do that but i don't even think it counts as painting since painting is an action and that action never took place since all he did was dribble paint....
Thats like turning on a camera and saying you made a film....no it doesn't work like that theres more to it....If i filmed a piece of toast for 5 hours and showed it to you would you call it a master piece, would you try to find meaning in it, would you think think i was trying to express something, if you do your retarded and im sure there are ppl who would....
its pain dribbled on canvas....nothing pioneering about that
_________________ signatures by Hostage Co. <3 ~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
>>
