My Deer borg..

dom · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:14 pm

I think it's cool; but, I don't find it cool enough to have one in my living room. It doesn't really bother me - I doubt they would go out and kill animals just for this. Probably left overs from hunting for deer meat.

and holy shit, the guy on tv has a nose like tucan sam

emperor3000 · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 1049 **Location:** Home

Yeah, pretty cool, but if they killed the animal just for them to screw with is plain wrong.

but if its dead by nature then its ok.

Least they are making the animals look bad, but rather better looking and admirable.

XemnasXD · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:30 pm

less animal more borg

Cruor · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 1999 **Location:**

I was hoping this would be a Star Trek topic.

Grimm-.- · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:12 pm

My Thoughts:

Awesome. Awesome. Awesome.

Its Like a new, really 'Awesome' Form of Art.

When I die im gonna have this done to me FTW.

XemnasXD · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:19 pm

Cruor wrote:

I was hoping this would be a Star Trek topic.

you mad cause they pushed the new movie back?

strangelove · **Joined:** Aug 2007 **Posts:** 1255 **Location:** no

I think it looks pretty neat. It's not like they're killing the animals just to do this. (are they?) Reminds me of that Body World exhibition I went to about a year ago. http://www.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,,669680,00.html

Pretty cool. =)

Dystopia · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2317 **Location:**

I see the artistic side to it, I don't think its sick and wrong, unless they kill the animals to do this, but I'm guessing they were already dead?

You can't just blindly say its sick and wrong, and its not crap I like this kinda stuff makes you think.

And they're never going to replace animal parts with robotics in reality, so dont get too worked up about that -_-"

DO NOT start a controversial flame at me...

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 9:46 pm

Dystopia wrote:

I see the artistic side to it, I don't think its sick and wrong, unless they kill the animals to do this, but I'm guessing they were already dead?

You can't just blindly say its sick and wrong, and its not crap I like this kinda stuff makes you think.

And they're never going to replace animal parts with robotics in reality, so dont get too worked up about that -_-"

DO NOT start a controversial flame at me...

Yes, cause when things are dead, it's allright to mess them up, even for artisctic purposes.

Dystopia · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2317 **Location:**

Priam wrote:

Dystopia wrote:

I see the artistic side to it, I don't think its sick and wrong, unless they kill the animals to do this, but I'm guessing they were already dead?

You can't just blindly say its sick and wrong, and its not crap I like this kinda stuff makes you think.

And they're never going to replace animal parts with robotics in reality, so dont get too worked up about that -_-"

DO NOT start a controversial flame at me...

Yes, cause when things are dead, it's allright to mess them up, even for artisctic purposes.

Big deal, you wear them on your skin, you decorate your walls with them, they're on your furniture.

WHATS THE BIG DEAL? Don't act like this specific thing is sick and wrong, so you don't see the art in this? So when your asked to be seated on a leather chair, do you refuse? Do you think its sick and wrong?

GAH

mosiac · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 808 **Location:** ಠ_ಠ

@all the ew people. What's so disgusting, sick, wrong, and scary about this vs taxidermy? I don't really see the difference.

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:51 pm

Dystopia wrote:

Big deal, you wear them on your skin, you decorate your walls with them, they're on your furniture.

WHATS THE BIG DEAL? Don't act like this specific thing is sick and wrong, so you don't see the art in this? So when your asked to be seated on a leather chair, do you refuse? Do you think its sick and wrong?

GAH

Stop comparing an apple to a pitchfork, and grab some perspective.

Dystopia · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2317 **Location:**

...

I'm just going to control myself

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:58 pm

Dystopia wrote:

...

I'm just going to control myself

Quite sure we all expected nothing else.

Dystopia · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2317 **Location:**

Priam wrote:

Dystopia wrote:

...

I'm just going to control myself

Quite sure we all expected nothing else.

Yeah, unlike you.

You were just inching for your chair for a flame war weren't you?

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:05 pm

Dystopia wrote:

Yeah, unlike you.

You were just inching for your chair for a flame war weren't you?

Won't deny that.

There is that, and there is the single fact that i actually do believe your comparing two complete seperate things, to try and illustrate a point.

Reise · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 6650 **Location:**

Priam wrote:

Stop comparing an apple to a pitchfork, and grab some perspective.

Taxidermy and tanning leather is far nastier than putting little metal bits in your stuffed animals. Taxidermy by itself is widely regarded as art though, that's why people pay big bucks for pristine animal skins. Some people can see it, others can't. IMO it beats leaving the animal out there to rot.

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:18 pm

Reise wrote:

Priam wrote:

Stop comparing an apple to a pitchfork, and grab some perspective.

Taxidermy and tanning leather is far nastier than putting little metal bits in your stuffed animals. Taxidermy by itself is widely regarded as art though, that's why people pay big bucks for pristine animal skins. Some people can see it, others can't. IMO it beats leaving the animal out there to rot.

I know, there's even awards for the jolly best taxidermist. Twisted as that.

Dystopia · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2317 **Location:**

Just because that's your opinion doesn't make it a fact.

When I state my opinion and you attack it I take it at heart, because who are you, or anyone else for that matter to attack MY opinion?

When I state a "FACT" which I base on my own opinion, If you say that's wrong because its a fact well you have a right to, its a RIGHT or WRONG answer, but that's not the case since this is a controversial matter there is no right or wrong and its all opinion based.

If you misunderstood what I meant before well here are things in a little more detail.

I FEEL that this is no big deal, because taxidermy is already a big part of the world and it seems like theres not much controversy there. I FEEL that this is not offensive and I FEEL that people shouldn't be offended as mosiac said I FEEL that there is no difference between this and taxidermy. And I can see the artistic side to it. Now if you don't and you have a problem with taxidermy and/or this thats YOUR opinion and I really don't care about your opinion at this point.

I bolded some words so you can get the sense of opinion.

In the end, I don't care, speak your mind. Just don't attack my own opinions as facts, even if my opinion contradicts yours.

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:48 pm

Eventhough the word 'fact' was used entirely different from the way you just described, i shall put that aside.

This is a discussion. Should i not agree on your opinion, i'll make it known. Whether or not you're used to the way i do that, isn't really my problem. And tbh, i wasn't even that bad.

Allthough i must say, putting all the very cute, but rather gay highlights aside. I like the rewritten version of your opinion. They way it's in now, i wouldn't even have 'attacked' it.

Inuyasha584 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 1491 **Location:**

i r scared :cry:

crazyskwrls · **Joined:** Aug 2007 **Posts:** 2293 **Location:**

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

XemnasXD wrote:

Cruor wrote:

I was hoping this would be a Star Trek topic.

you mad cause they pushed the new movie back?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Silkroad Online Forums

My Deer borg..

Who is online