XuChu wrote:
China would not have self sovereignty? Never have I heard such bullshit.
How much of the aid do you think America gave to China was used the Japanese instead of the communists, do you even know what kind of support was given? If you know at all any history on the Sino-Japanese war/ modern Chinese history you'd know America was hardly a help.
Sure China has problems, but do we make problems for others? Who's the one that is standing the way of the unification of another country, who's the one that's waged campaigns throughout the world in their conquest for fuel. Moreover I've never said any country was perfect, this was not about perfection in the first place.
I'm narrow minded because I criticize America huh, god damn instead of talking complete rubbish, go read a book. Facts is something you definitely lack hypocrite.
Yes, Japan and Germany had complete control over their territories. I hardly doubt that China or Korea could have done anything in their state against Japan unless somebody defeated Japan and the only country that could was America. And you infer that America abuses other countries by dropping atomic bombs on Japan. Historians know that if we didn't use atomic bombs, the number of Japanese and American deaths would have been more than we can count.
You said it, China or Korea would not have self soverignty, or all the other european countries if it wasn't for the allies. And I'm talking about WWII, not the sino-japanese war. I'm not an idiot, I never mentioned the sino-japanese war. Don't post as if I said stupid things, I never talked about the sino-japanese war. Whats interesting is that you say that American help was minimal in the sino-Japanese war, but the war took place from 1937-1945 and America entered the war in 1941, helping the Chinese greatly. I hardly doubt the Chinese were capable of routing the Japanese without external help.
You keep talking as if your sympathetic for the divided Koreas. Most Koreans know that if America pulls all of its troops out, North Korea can make reunification attempts. Plus, South Korea doesnt want a Germany reunification scenario where Germany had to pour a boatload of shit to help out the poor economy of Eastern Germany. South Korea doesn't want to put economic strain on itself. Reunification is very very complicated in Korea, its not like in Germany where they say "yay lets reunify" and just finish it simply like that. So America has to stay in South Korea for political and economic reasons. America isn't in Korea to prevent it from reunifying, America is there to prevent North Korea from invading the south.
We can reunify when its time, and when I mean by "its time" that means Kim jong-il is dead and his government is dead which won't be in a while.
Have you been to Korea? People think America controls Korea, which is not true. I never see American soldiers patrolling the streets or disrupting activity by rampaging around in their tanks. American soldiers don't do anything but sit there and make sure North Korea doesn't do anything. And it sure is working, I don't think north korea would want to tangle with America.
I don't get how I'm a hypocrite. Its funny because you say a lot of stuff (i.e sino-Japanese war) that you don't know about and then accuse me of being a hypocrite. You don't even give a concrete example of how I'm a hypocrite. The only things I've been saying is facts. I think america has helped the world many times, you don't need to read a book to know that.
