we're not aiming for a bot-free game. that's not possible if joymax doesn't cooperate. we're aiming for a bot-free community here on srf. sure, we lose members. but being a legit, anti-bot forum is what seperates srf from all other sro forums.
edit: oh, and no, banning them from this forum will probably not make them stop botting in-game. but the fact that people do make remade accounts after they get banned, means they do like this forum and just can't say goodbye to it. which means banning does hurt them in a way.
yea, they just banned two of my good friends and now rome forums are dead...
So true. SRF is going downhill.
any of you have a problem with bans of those two "friends", send me a pm. i rather not discuss this out in the open, unles you guys want to tell the rest of the forum what your friends were like in the private section we provided you.
(..) means they do like this forum and just can't say goodbye to it. which means banning does hurt them in a way.
I seriously doubt that since they don't have to wait long times / lost privileges... They just make new acc and no problem to them ...
seriously boy, what's your problem.
you're here to tell us that banning botters is not getting us anywhere? at least they have to put efford into making new accounts. they will eventually just stop coming here and find a new community to be a part of. i'm just wondering if you're insinuating that we should just stop banning botters and allow everyone we banned in the past back in. because if that's not what you mean, then idk what the hell you're whining about now.
edit: okay, i'll make this really easy for you guys this time. look carefully.
a game is not a community. there's a difference. a game is something you play. a community is a group of people. now in our case, sro is a game, and srf is a community. okay?
so:
sro =\= srf
sro = bot infected srf = legit
sro = going down hill srf = here to stay
a community normally outlasts a game because of the contact we have on forums/msn/whatever. so the fact that sro is bot infected and people are saying sro will die, does not mean the same goes for srf.
Leave mike be.. DJ and Sacc take good care of him feeding him hay, letting him graze in the fields and they shear his wool twice a year. One cannot be responsible for ones actions when they lack the ability to understand the fabric of their actions.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for remaking a banned account. -SG>>
Leave mike be.. DJ and Sacc take good care of him feeding him hay, letting him graze in the fields and they shear his wool twice a year. One cannot be responsible for ones actions when they lack the ability to understand the fabric of their actions.
lol Is this SirShaDowCaT? =) Look at all these "New Users" I'm lol'ing, really.
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 160 Location: Every where and No where
NoOneSpecial wrote:
XTC wrote:
mike2007 wrote:
more fail, from another bot supporter.
random bot accusation is fail imo
Leave mike be.. DJ and Sacc take good care of him feeding him hay, letting him graze in the fields and they shear his wool twice a year. One cannot be responsible for ones actions when they lack the ability to understand the fabric of their actions.
NoOneSpecial wrote:
XTC wrote:
mike2007 wrote:
more fail, from another bot supporter.
random bot accusation is fail imo
Leave mike be.. DJ and Sacc take good care of him feeding him hay, letting him graze in the fields and they shear his wool twice a year. One cannot be responsible for ones actions when they lack the ability to understand the fabric of their actions.
The fabric of their actions... The framework...
Fabric, sometimes substituted for 'framework'
Quote:
frame·work Audio Help /ˈfreɪmˌwɜrk/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[freym-wurk] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. a skeletal structure designed to support or enclose something. 2. a frame or structure composed of parts fitted and joined together. 3. the construction or sale of frames. 4. work done in, on, or with a frame.
Framework can be replaced with structure
Quote:
9. Sociology. a. the system or complex of beliefs held by members of a social group. b. the system of relations between the constituent groups of a society. c. the relationship between or the interrelated arrangement of the social institutions of a society or culture, as of mores, marriage customs, or family. d. the pattern of relationships, as of status or friendship, existing among the members of a group or society.
So you're saying they don't understand why they report botters and therefore they cannot be held responsible for their actions. Your attempt to appear intelligent failed, they can be held responsible and they do understand their actions. You make claims based on nothing and I suspect you to be a disgruntled person they may have exposed. Care to explain where your dislike of DJ, Mike, and Sach stems from?
_________________ “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms (of government) those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny” - Thomas Jefferson
I love it when ppl use big words they dont really understand the meaning of. Id follow the common lexicon and call it ironic... but its not.
Lol me too. I fully understand the realtionism between the complexitinarian viewpoints of the campriconial time period and interpentagonalistic eras now.
SRF isn't dying. Learn to spell before you post as well.
_________________
angelfire101 wrote:
guys with tough balls should do this; go to joymax office and literally beat them up. now you guys should only beat up dudes who work on big offices of joymax. you must record it and make US SEE BLEEDING JOYMAX EMPLOYEES! AINT THAT FREAKIN GREAT!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
and i'm 100% legit so..... i will be here for a while. and i'm almost a level up! (elite member)
