Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 1837 Location: Georgian4ever
Zeus : It was Shittest worst FW ever !!!!! . Mortis still has it . BC and Wazzup Attacked Eachother not even try to work together lol . so what u think . and ofcourse Mortis is one powerful union so ..
We started pretty good at Eldorado, but when we were at the guard towers everyone was running around and we didn't manage to take them down in time. I have to admit Hayal union is good. But i don;t think good enough to keep it after 2 weeks. Only 1 full uni was attaking, from my uni it was only 3ABEPA and 1 more guild and _Europeans_ without uni... so not so many attackers, next 2 weeks we will take them down from their throne.
Infect wrote: We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Since when is babysitting considered legit?
I'm sorry when in my statement did i ever say that babysitting was considered legit? So.. die
So in other words, your guild is full of players that are either legit, or bots that babysit. That's still a bot guild, no matter what way you look at it. If you yourself don't bot, you're still supporting bots by being in that guild, which is against the rules of these forums.
Banhammer?
_________________ Missing the good times in SRO...
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
Infect wrote: We are not a true botting guild. All of us are either Legit or babysit our bots.
Since when is babysitting considered legit?
I'm sorry when in my statement did i ever say that babysitting was considered legit? So.. die
So in other words, your guild is full of players that are either legit, or bots that babysit. That's still a bot guild, no matter what way you look at it. If you yourself don't bot, you're still supporting bots by being in that guild, which is against the rules of these forums.
Banhammer?
How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
_________________ If faith is a crutch, I'm not limping anymore.
How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
Well I'm not the one who brought it up in the first place, and I guess I shouldn't have responded to it in this thread, but too late for that I guess.
No, Avalon shouldn't be banned because there MIGHT be a bot in it, because that bot would be banned. The guild doesn't support bots. A guild that claims to be legit, but knowingly allows babysitting botters should be banned. Perhaps Infect's guild does ban the babysitters upon discovery, or maybe they accept them. I don't know.
I just wanted to try to clarify my post some. Let's get back on topic shall we?
_________________ Missing the good times in SRO...
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
How is he supporting bots by being a part of a legit guild that may or may not contain bots? I think we would need more proof.
All I want is a distinct, clear definition of a bot supporter. For example, Avalon should be banned, because there MIGHT be a chance there is a botter in the guild?
Sure.
edit: and while I'm anti-bot, could we please just not bring it up in almost EVERY topic? That includes those closet botters who like to play.
Well I'm not the one who brought it up in the first place, and I guess I shouldn't have responded to it in this thread, but too late for that I guess.
No, Avalon shouldn't be banned because there MIGHT be a bot in it, because that bot would be banned. The guild doesn't support bots. A guild that claims to be legit, but knowingly allows babysitting botters should be banned. Perhaps Infect's guild does ban the babysitters upon discovery, or maybe they accept them. I don't know.
I just wanted to try to clarify my post some. Let's get back on topic shall we?
You got it.
Anyone know who won Olympus? I can never play due to the time zone...
_________________ If faith is a crutch, I'm not limping anymore.
Hopefully someday I'll be high enough level to actually participate in a fortress war. I went in one time to watch, and died instantly. Sounds like it was pretty uneventful this week in Venus FW.
_________________ Missing the good times in SRO...
SRO: 1x, STR Blader (Thebes) 54, STR blader (Venice) 0x, INT wizard (Venice) 19, INT spear (Venice) 34, STR rogue/bard (Venus) 0x, STR blader (Venus) 8x, INT bard/cleric (Gaia)
Think the past 4 FWs have been pretty lame on Venus...the 5th FW ago was the "last stand" of the opposing guilds and unions, or so it seemed. Loved showing up at the front gate and just seeing about 60+ ppl to kill. Last 3 or 4 have basically been: show up then fart around, or go back to sleep lol.
_________________
Quote:
We should stop treating people like objects, or at least treat our objects with more respect.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum