|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
BladeSkillz
|
Post subject: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:35 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 225 Location:
|
I'm making a new character for fun; a force nuker.
Question is should I go fire or light?
The two options I was thinking of are:
Fire 90, Cold 90, Force 90, Light 30 (at 100 cap light 0) or Light 90, Cold 90, Force 90
I know that for 90 cap I don't really need light maxed to 90 since 40 is still good enough to get a decent magical damage increase buff. However, will I need the buff after level 100? Will I still do more damage using fire nukes with no buff over light nukes with max buff?
_________________ --- Blader 4EVA Condemned FTW
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Entangle
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:37 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 606 Location: Thaurissan Oceanic WoW
|
|
Top |
|
 |
BladeSkillz
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:45 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 225 Location:
|
Honestly, do I really need to say don't recommend I choose a weapon mastery...
I'm making a "fun" build. It doesn't have to be the best character in the god damn server.
_________________ --- Blader 4EVA Condemned FTW
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JcNieto
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:48 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 131 Location:
|
the one ewith force would be interesting bc of the debuffs but you would have prblems with holyword and the other one is for only damage
_________________ << banned for proof of botting. -cin >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stress
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:55 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
|
90 cap: 90 fire 90 force 60 light 60 cold 100 cap: 100 fire 100 force 60 cold 40 light 
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
the_wicked
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:00 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 3820 Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
|
first is total pvp. However you don't need fire at all. No phys attacks, high mag def to boot.
force will improve your build. You will have more MP to tank better in snow, high phys def from ice, and the force debuffs will allow you to kill any non-cleric builds.
_________________

|
|
Top |
|
 |
Snoopy
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:28 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 4016 Location: Australia
|
Build I'd consider strongest. Cold 90, Fire 90, Heuksal 90, Light 30. Spear ofc.
I just like spears, for Bicheon.
Bicheon 90, Fire 90, Light 60, Cold 60. dunno why, and in protector.
_________________ << banned for racism. -cin >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GoogleVsYahoo
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:40 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 59 Location: Earth
|
i find it funny that most of the people posting are not answering his question..
and btw that build is not fun.. debuff nuke nuke debuff nuke nuke ect..is not fun, after snow shield has run out ur dead..
i find nukers with a weapon mastery more fun than that.. cause u still have debuffs(sword mastery) and u still have nukes.. u also have a phy defs buff, u can use that after snow shield runs out, u also have KD and a higher % of blocking..
but if u must know which is stonger it would be 90force 90light 90ice 30fire(fire shield buff)... because why would u need more mag attack dmg if u can debuff the hell outta them..
thats my view on it
_________________ <<banned from SRF for remaking a banned account. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mousetrap
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:45 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 817 Location:
|
wrong section, and he wants a force nuker, one without a weapon tree so I don't know why people are suggesting.
Go 90 force/ ice/ light and 30 fire. You should be able to kill most chinese builds with your force debuffs, against a euro str with cleric sub you aren't going to kill him as a pure nuker either way so fire doesn't matter (if they know how to play at least) (darn, someone else beat me to it)
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Barotix
|
Post subject: Re: Which would be stronger? Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:05 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 9250 Location: Sand
|
C&S is that way =>>
_________________
Maddening
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|