Moment of Truth

xAnyeongx · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 172 **Location:** silkroad

I've included these gold bots in my new list for next inspection, if these don't even show up on the damn list, then it's true that you can't get banned if you buy silk. These are straight up gold farmers flooding the bunwhangs atm, if anyone really wants to put that theory to the test go bug report these gold farmers and see by next inspection they aren't on the list.

[EDIT]
Bot Names:
HUN264_5 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1094173
XUN898_4 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1103032
ZEI338_3 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1097509
LAI338_2 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1098481
HEI821_6 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1109905
TUO364_1 - http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1099012

I'm sure there is more, prolly offline atm, different training area, etc.

[EDIT]

NOT BANNED AFTER 7/8/08

Disconn3cted · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3293 **Location:** WV, USA

sadly this is probably something best left untested lol

Kieran · **Joined:** Jun 2008 **Posts:** 121 **Location:**

You're going to need more than 4 for it to be a fair test.. at least 20 before we can made bold statements like that.

Orotiagito · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 799 **Location:**

Only need one to show up on the list for proof.

Snoopy · **Posted:** Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:48 am

Doubt they'll get banned. Though they should, I hate trying to grind with those idiots ksing me ='[.

Doppleganger · **Posted:** Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:42 am

Disconn3cted wrote:

sadly this is probably something best left untested lol

lol no screw that lets do it.

nightbloom · **Joined:** Jan 2006 **Posts:** 5492 **Location:**

Id give it a month or more to show tho before you start screaming that they arent banned and buying silk = no ban. JM has this weird month delay it seems.

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

in the mean time, drop gold to get them stuck =]

Detective · **Joined:** Mar 2008 **Posts:** 219 **Location:**

From the business point of view, as much as the policy goes... it makes no sense to ban all their silk buyers (money paying customers) and leave behind the kids and players from poorer region which will never pay for silk and play this game just for the sake that it's free.

It's not too hard to understand and rather than it being moment of truth it is more of a "truth" already for me =p

StacE · **Joined:** Aug 2007 **Posts:** 502 **Location:**

Your test is shit.

1. You need to wait multiple ban lists for them to appear.

2. You need atleast 5-10x the amount of characters you currently have.

4 bots in a sea of thousands and you think your test is valid? :S

xAnyeongx · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 172 **Location:** silkroad

I said in my posts there are botters like this flooding the bunwhangs (obviously 4 can't flood the bunwhangs alone), as in premium, 6th degree garms/weaps, etc. I believe maybe 10+, i'll just edit the thread and get the names down later if u guys want to really report it.

FaintSmile · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 142 **Location:**

Or... You could just see that damn near nobody over 80 [cept for a few longlived gold bots] got banned, and that the majority of the highlevels [botters+silk buyers] on your server are currently still playing. Wouldn't this be conclusive enough for you?

[If you are a botter; test the following to reassure yourself or come to the same conclusion. This would work best if you can multiclient. Make a new account, don't buy silk on it, and just bot it up for a bit. Probability that it gets banned, assuming that you bot it for awhile is pretty large. Happened to friends of mine, while their silk-using-bots were left intact (botting from the same IP, same pc, using the same bot).]

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

that's depressing

BalkanFanaticS · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 768 **Location:**

FaintSmile wrote:

Or... You could just see that damn near nobody over 80 [cept for a few longlived gold bots] got banned, and that the majority of the highlevels [botters+silk buyers] on your server are currently still playing. Wouldn't this be conclusive enough for you?

thats about it .

dam , some ppl just cant understand simple things .

2806 · **Joined:** May 2008 **Posts:** 54 **Location:** N/A

Kieran wrote:

You're going to need more than 4 for it to be a fair test.. at least 20 before we can made bold statements like that.

I agree, get a good list of them and then we'll see...

Tokughavita · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 789 **Location:**

joymax will probably ban them because they are gold bots and will HAVE to be re-rolled and will buy more silk, even if they only buy a tiny bit of silk to begin with.

and besides, its the playerbots who don't get banned when they buy silk, because they buy a LOT of silk

Quyxz · **Posted:** Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:22 pm

I like this test, we have all the time to expand the list and if it is not waterproof, we still have an indication.

_Shinigami_ · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 2191 **Location:**

lol if those are BABEL bots

then your wasting your time

JesusLOL · **Joined:** May 2008 **Posts:** 245 **Location:** hell

Out of ~370 banned goldbots they didn't ban today the one with silk, weird. :wink:

xAnyeongx · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 172 **Location:** silkroad

yep, this doesn't look good

I see you put a premium on one of your gold farmers, Got_Fuked.

http://www.rev6.com/player.asp?id=1230425

How bold of you XD

borat2 · **Posted:** Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:20 am

Make a list for yourself don't post it here, it is not the first time Joymax react on an event that happens here.

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

JesusLOL wrote:

Out of ~370 banned goldbots they didn't ban today the one with silk, weird. :wink:

Joymax plans their bans months in advance.

Silkroad Online Forums

Moment of Truth

Who is online