Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:34 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Location: Errrrm
Is it true that warlock debuffs @ lvl 90, become obselete when the enemy has the last holyword?

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Last edited by NoWhere2hide on Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:35 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1162
Location:
Venus
Not all of em.

_________________
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:57 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3657
Location: MrTwilligers skin
It's against the rules to post on behalf of a banned member, right? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:01 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 17293
Location: Ghosting around
tedtwilliger wrote:
It's against the rules to post on behalf of a banned member, right? :roll:


Well that's bullshit if it's true.

And not all indeed.

_________________
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:07 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3657
Location: MrTwilligers skin
How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should never have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.

Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.

If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD :wink:


Last edited by tedtwilliger on Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:14 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Location: Errrrm
ted go die

Edit anyone care to give a decent answer?

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:16 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 17293
Location: Ghosting around
tedtwilliger wrote:
How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should [b[never[/b] have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.

Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.

If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD :wink:


True, you're right...My bad.

_________________
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:20 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Location: Errrrm
For ted, http://www.phpbb.com/community/faq.php?mode=bbcode

learn before you post dumb shit

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:26 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3657
Location: MrTwilligers skin
Two flames in one thread, congratulations.

Enjoy that ban of yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:02 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9250
Location: Sand
Cases:
    1 Count of posting for a banned member
    2 counts of flaming
3 strike&GD "Zero Tolerance" rules apply
User: NoWhere2hide
Ban Pending.

-----------------------------
Thank you for the report.

_________________
Maddening
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:07 pm 
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9967
Location: västkustskt
Barotix wrote:
Cases:
    1 Count of posting for a banned member
    2 counts of flaming
3 strike&GD "Zero Tolerance" rules apply
User: NoWhere2hide
Ban Pending.

-----------------------------
Thank you for the report.


Don't forget viewtopic.php?f=8&t=96569

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:07 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3657
Location: MrTwilligers skin
And the system works.

( sorry for the "heated" nature of that report barotix )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:29 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Location: cvzc
errr care much :roll: ,

Ted your like one of those kids that runs to mummy, "mummmmm bla bla has pissed his pants"

@ admins, least this time u banned me properly, unlike last time.

oh just notice....Ban Count=1 LOL

bye 4 now :)

_________________
<<banned from SRF for remaking a banned account. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:35 pm 
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9967
Location: västkustskt
NoWhere2hide2nd wrote:
errr care much :roll: ,

Ted your like one of those kids that runs to mummy, "mummmmm bla bla has pissed his pants"

@ admins, least this time u banned me properly, unlike last time.

oh just notice....Ban Count=1 LOL

bye 4 now :)


Banning is literally 1 click away. It takes no time at all.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:37 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2293
Location:
Off Topic
seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?

and naughty cin!

_________________
Image Image
thnx Kraq


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:41 am 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9250
Location: Sand
crazyskwrls wrote:
seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?

and naughty cin!


His original post said, "Posting for Deacon." He edited it before I could lock it and prevent editing.

_________________
Maddening
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:03 am 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1978
Location:
Off Topic
I think that bleed still works not 100% sure, but i only use decay and dark decayed when someone has holy word on so i dunno

_________________
Image
Image


Want to play Jade Dynasty and get a bunch of free stuff?
In USA-East, The Billows
My Inductor ID is 8390004X080400090002522Z0d21fe
Copy that code and paste it in the box when you make a new character.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:06 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2125
Location: Away
No, not all debuffs are useless at 90, not sure which ones still apply tho, ask Fug-Dug (SP?) his life is warlocks lol.

Off Topic - Leave Ted alone, he is just trying to clean up these forums, if people keep posting for banned members the actual ban would become useless.

_________________
penfold1992 wrote:
durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Image Image
Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!


Last edited by CloudStrider on Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:15 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2293
Location:
Off Topic
i beg to differ...

miss deacon, but then again this is not OTL....

_________________
Image Image
thnx Kraq


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:26 am 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 449
Location:
Xian
NoWhere2hide wrote:
Is it true that warlock debuffs @ lvl 90, become obselete when the enemy has the last holyword?


Panic and Bleed still work. And Stun, of course.

_________________
Adv4nc3chao: Level 89 Hybrid Warlock/Cleric
Quit since Jan. 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:32 am 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 365
Location: Hotan
Barotix wrote:
crazyskwrls wrote:
seriously... wtf... how do u know he was posting for some other guy?

and naughty cin!


His original post said, "Posting for Deacon." He edited it before I could lock it and prevent editing.



i lold

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:48 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 806
Location: Cabal online, Mars server
tedtwilliger wrote:
How is it bullshit? If someone is banned they should never have the option to post anything, ever. Unless for some reason there is a just reason to unban them they shouldn't return to this site.

Now if people start posting on behalf of people ( much like cin did for blackfox recently which im kinda annoyed about ) than they in effect gets rid of their ban. It gives a voice back to people who simply shouldn't be here.

If you ask me anyone doing it should be warned then temp banned, simple as that. Zero tolerance in GD :wink:

Ted, only for you:)
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warrio ... tenazi.htm

_________________
Well, looking at GD, i cant say anything but i had to show how is it there.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103978
Also, trolls in action:)
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=83961&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Enjoy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:39 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 895
Location:
Oasis
Hai Hideyyy

Come back to sro plz lol

_________________
Silkroad Online.
Server:Venus
IGN:KrazyStrong
Level:78
Build:Warrior
Guild:SuddenDeath

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:32 pm 
Regular Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 203
Location:
Venus
Remember that u can always use disease first..which increases the curse lvl by 1..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: warlock vs Holy Word
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:27 pm 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 449
Location:
Xian
Redd wrote:
Remember that u can always use disease first..which increases the curse lvl by 1..


That's actually a misconception :(
Of course Disease still works at a certain probability assuming both Holy Spell and Vampire Touch/Kiss are maxed out, but that's only because Disease is always one level ahead of Holy Spell (10D with maxed Vampire skills VS. 9D Holy Spell prevention). Disease's only effect is to increase the probability of debuffs to near 100%. But even with 10D Disease on top of 9D Holy Spell, Holy Spell will prevent all debuffs except bleed and panic.

_________________
Adv4nc3chao: Level 89 Hybrid Warlock/Cleric
Quit since Jan. 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group