|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
devilti
|
Post subject: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:08 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 775 Location: denver
|
so word is that fire does more damage than light nukes, however my question is taking into account of the light piercing series with the increase in magical damage, is the difference still alot? or is it quite minimal
_________________ boyaka boyaka.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
FlameWrathH
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:26 pm |
|
Casual Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 79 Location:
|
Not really big but nor really small you get it  if the difference without it is 2k now its going to be 1k difference ( just example )
_________________
 Credits for this AWESOME sig go to inky(:
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tia
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 5:41 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 859 Location:
|
FlameWrathH wrote: Not really big but nor really small you get it  if the difference without it is 2k now its going to be 1k difference ( just example ) o rlly? Goseki proved a while ago that light hits more then fire, cant find the thread tho....
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tasdik
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:39 am |
|
Forum God |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 13206 Location: Life
|
|
Top |
|
 |
devilti
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 3:21 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 775 Location: denver
|
Thats a great thread Thanks guys. So I def like light better coz of the speed. I was just wondering if the mag buff outweighs the physical buff and the damage increase.
_________________ boyaka boyaka.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Goseki
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:56 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3452 Location:
|
devilti wrote: Thats a great thread Thanks guys. So I def like light better coz of the speed. I was just wondering if the mag buff outweighs the physical buff and the damage increase. Err, didn't you read the thread... if you're a pure int, the phy dmg buff doesn't do much at all. The mag dmg buff increases your imbue which increases your dmg when using phy attacks.
_________________
.curve wrote: Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheKramers
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:25 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 42 Location:
|
Goseki wrote: devilti wrote: Thats a great thread Thanks guys. So I def like light better coz of the speed. I was just wondering if the mag buff outweighs the physical buff and the damage increase. Err, didn't you read the thread... if you're a pure int, the phy dmg buff doesn't do much at all. The mag dmg buff increases your imbue which increases your dmg when using phy attacks. Doesn't your imbue make nukes more powerful as well??
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Goseki
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:48 am |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3452 Location:
|
TheKramers wrote: Goseki wrote: devilti wrote: Thats a great thread Thanks guys. So I def like light better coz of the speed. I was just wondering if the mag buff outweighs the physical buff and the damage increase. Err, didn't you read the thread... if you're a pure int, the phy dmg buff doesn't do much at all. The mag dmg buff increases your imbue which increases your dmg when using phy attacks. Doesn't your imbue make nukes more powerful as well?? Yea. That's why the light buff is soooo much better for pure int. Fire buff has barely noticeable effects. The mag dmg increases works with imbues and nukes. So it makes your nukes hit harder, imbue hit harder, aka phy attacks benefit more. Ppl that say fire is better are fire nukers comparing builds when they are pvping a light nuker. Against each other, the fire nuker will hit more since he has the mag def increase buff. If both nukers attack the same opponent, then light will hit harder.
_________________
.curve wrote: Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheKramers
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:56 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 42 Location:
|
Yes, I knew all that.
Why choose between the 2? A real nuker is ice/light/fire. Use light nukes and fire imbue.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Goseki
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:16 am |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3452 Location:
|
TheKramers wrote: Yes, I knew all that.
Why choose between the 2? A real nuker is ice/light/fire. Use light nukes and fire imbue. If you're going to do pure force, might as well go euro wiz. A pure china force char loses so much for what he gains, it's better to just go wiz. Ice light fire = cast wall, nuke, hope they die before wall or snow runs out. Wiz can use fear, kb, root, or even cleric sub skills to defend themselves. A china pure force has walls... that's IT. You gain like an extra 5k dmg and sacrifice ALL the wep skills and effects...
_________________
.curve wrote: Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


|
|
Top |
|
 |
devilti
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:38 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 775 Location: denver
|
i did read the thread, I was saying prior to that/and the purpose of making this thread was to ask if light does more dmg than fire. Since everyone says fire does more dmg, and suggest alot of nukers get it
_________________ boyaka boyaka.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheKramers
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:51 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 42 Location:
|
Goseki wrote: If you're going to do pure force, might as well go euro wiz. A pure china force char loses so much for what he gains, it's better to just go wiz. Ice light fire = cast wall, nuke, hope they die before wall or snow runs out.
Wiz can use fear, kb, root, or even cleric sub skills to defend themselves. A china pure force has walls... that's IT. You gain like an extra 5k dmg and sacrifice ALL the wep skills and effects... Lol, don't forget that Chinese chars can use potions more than once every 15 seconds =p In a fight between any chinese char and a wiz, as long as they're similarly equipped, the chinese will always win.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tasdik
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:05 am |
|
Forum God |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 13206 Location: Life
|
TheKramers wrote: Lol, don't forget that Chinese chars can use potions more than once every 15 seconds =p In a fight between any chinese char and a wiz, as long as they're similarly equipped, the chinese will always win. You forget that an overwhelming majority of chinese chars have weapon skills. If they didn't the euro would always win. Pots or no pots.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Goseki
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:13 am |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3452 Location:
|
TheKramers wrote: Goseki wrote: If you're going to do pure force, might as well go euro wiz. A pure china force char loses so much for what he gains, it's better to just go wiz. Ice light fire = cast wall, nuke, hope they die before wall or snow runs out.
Wiz can use fear, kb, root, or even cleric sub skills to defend themselves. A china pure force has walls... that's IT. You gain like an extra 5k dmg and sacrifice ALL the wep skills and effects... Lol, don't forget that Chinese chars can use potions more than once every 15 seconds =p In a fight between any chinese char and a wiz, as long as they're similarly equipped, the chinese will always win. Mana Drought, Lightning Impact, Dull, Bind, Abs Dmg of Cleric. Faster pots doesn't seem that amazing anymore. If Mana Drought lands and you can't pill it off in time, you're screwed. Since Chinese pure force nuker has no interruption skills, and abs dmg goes through walls, Cleric passive, healing orbit, 2 abs dmg = dead nuker. I have 100% str on all my gear and hp maxed for a pure int s/s. 2 abs dmg will kill me unless I get lucky with vigors. You need Devil SPirit or a Prem+ to be able to take the hit.
_________________
.curve wrote: Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


|
|
Top |
|
 |
XMoshe
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:59 am |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 17293 Location: Ghosting around
|
As s/s char I'd go for light/ice. Spear ice/fire.
Well in all honesty I would go max bich/fire and remaining 110 shared between ice/light for s/s but that's just me.
_________________
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
devilti
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:36 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 775 Location: denver
|
XMoshe wrote: As s/s char I'd go for light/ice. Spear ice/fire.
Well in all honesty I would go max bich/fire and remaining 110 shared between ice/light for s/s but that's just me. thats exactly my question why fire for spear instead of light?
_________________ boyaka boyaka.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Goseki
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:04 am |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3452 Location:
|
devilti wrote: XMoshe wrote: As s/s char I'd go for light/ice. Spear ice/fire.
Well in all honesty I would go max bich/fire and remaining 110 shared between ice/light for s/s but that's just me. thats exactly my question why fire for spear instead of light? More Defense. Fire would help Spear tank more, and since it already has higher base dmg, it can sacrifice some dmg for survival. S/S has the shield for tanking and low dmg, so choosing light for s/s gives higher dmg with less def.
_________________
.curve wrote: Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


|
|
Top |
|
 |
XMoshe
|
Post subject: Re: Pure INT fire vs light nuke Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:16 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 17293 Location: Ghosting around
|
Goseki wrote: devilti wrote: XMoshe wrote: As s/s char I'd go for light/ice. Spear ice/fire.
Well in all honesty I would go max bich/fire and remaining 110 shared between ice/light for s/s but that's just me. thats exactly my question why fire for spear instead of light? More Defense. Fire would help Spear tank more, and since it already has higher base dmg, it can sacrifice some dmg for survival. S/S has the shield for tanking and low dmg, so choosing light for s/s gives higher dmg with less def. Bingo =p and I just love the immunity/fire nukes/fire wall.
_________________
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|