Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Int Build
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:31 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 547
Location:
Greece
It's pretty obvious this is posted somewhere on the forums, but I'm too lazy to find..so I apologize ahead of time. Feel free to link me to the appropriate thread, or discuss it here

80 Fire
80 Light
80 Cold
s/s for pvp
spear for pve.

This any good for pure INT? I'm not really so hot for K/D stab. In other words, is it possible for a full int to live without any Bicheon? Also, what are the benefits for this build, if its any good?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:42 am 
New Member
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
It's enough good ,but the best is 60 fire or light and 80 force =)

_________________
<<banned from SRF for promotion of the sale of digital items. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:50 am 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4377
Location: De Dutch
No weap? Only nukes? Damn.. You will never win at a pvp ( cape fight )

_________________
I cannot sing the blues...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:53 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 547
Location:
Greece
Deacon wrote:
No weap? Only nukes? Damn.. You will never win at a pvp ( cape fight )


Lol ya I know, I think I could live with that though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:53 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 547
Location:
Greece
EgHu4Ka wrote:
It's enough good ,but the best is 60 fire or light and 80 force =)


Lol I've been hearing that a lot lately, anyway you can shine some light as to why? It sounds interesting, especially with the debuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:15 pm 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 413
Location:
Xian
You would need bicheon for the combos which have nice effects. Like the Lightning chain has bleed, impotent and division ( correct me if im wrong ) and thoes effects help a lot in pvp. Without division, a lvl 80 nuker can do around 7k damage but with division it can do like 10k damage which is a big difference. But if you want to stay pure nuker, well go ahead. Its your choice, pick whatever you like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:54 pm 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 109
Location:
Eldorado
hi we are you from

thank you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: hi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:02 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 547
Location:
Greece
Prelibiton wrote:
hi we are you from

thank you!


lol >_>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:30 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1464
Location:
Aege
being just a pure nuker wouldnt give you any disabling moves. Kd allows you to not only pot but to cancel the others attack. without glaive skills you cant stun which also cancels attacks allowing you to pot or in the case of my warlock to run like hell away.

I really think all builds need a disabling move its important.

_________________
My pride and joy CrazySuby is no longer mine. She is and always will belong to Dutchy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group