Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

xMoDx · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 456 **Location:**

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage....

PS: i cant find this post on search so ill just post it,

to admin: if this post is already been posted and feel annoying, moderators feel free to delete this, thanks

3DoorsDown · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 46 **Location:** Lietuva

i think its ATT cuz... bowers needs to be fast..faster dmg...faster kill

Dark_Force · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 318 **Location:**

blue hawk ftw :wink:

Sekkaigan · **Posted:** Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:24 pm

well i would go phys because looks are EVERYTHING

xMoDx · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 456 **Location:**

hmmmm but technically which would be advisable for pvp and pve? phy dmg for pvp and attrate for pve? yes? no?

glavie · **Joined:** Dec 2006 **Posts:** 1195 **Location:**

Depends on your weapon.

Good weapon you want blue hawk to take advantage of weapon.

Crappy weapon you want an independent damage increase.

I don't think anyone has actually tested it though

so I can't say 100% sure.

tomiotar · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 598 **Location:**

I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.

PS: I use just blue and didnt farm the lighting.

xMoDx · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 456 **Location:**

if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

elnawawi · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 338 **Location:**

tomiotar wrote:

I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.

Quote:

if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

Both are right

glavie · **Joined:** Dec 2006 **Posts:** 1195 **Location:**

xMoDx wrote:

if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?

lynette · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 56 **Location:**

hmmm, i think attk rating will be much better for pvp,
whereas when farming, use the phy damage hawk.

Main reason i think that the phy damage dealt on human players is not going to be significant , there will be damage, but not significant
compared to when you use attk rating, there is higher chances for u to do your max range of damage ( is there higher chance to deal status too? i m not sure, but it seems does, need confirmation though) , and , that, is significant damage.

tomiotar · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 598 **Location:**

glavie wrote:

xMoDx wrote:

if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?

I dont have it but Ive fought people that have it and it did on me like 100 dmg and didnt hit really often :roll:

.

lynette · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 56 **Location:**

ya....thats y i think attk rating is better from what i stated above

Silkroad Online Forums

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

Who is online