Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 92% naked full int??
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:59 am 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 536
Location:
Azteca
is 92% mag balance naked is a full int?? if so im thinking about adding alittle str to my wizard and still keep the 92%. is that good??

_________________
ISRO [Azteca]Helena lvl 56 wiz/cleric


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 92% naked full int??
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:16 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1369
Location:
Aege
Vuesters92 wrote:
is 92% mag balance naked is a full int?? if so im thinking about adding alittle str to my wizard and still keep the 92%. is that good??
i thought it was 96% for a naked full int but i could be wrong, mabe it changes in later lvls


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:49 pm 
Common Member
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
most people will disagree but i believe that wizards should have a hybrid build, they 1 hit everything with damage to spare, if you make a hybrid, youll still be able to do that but you can take more then one hit by the enemy.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:54 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2979
Location: Playin' Talkin'
I'm keeping 90%

_________________
Image


Niyoke wrote:
err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:11 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 940
Location:
Xian
Wizards: Pure int is fine. There's a cleric there to buff you so you can tank a few glaives.

Int: 96% naked is pure int. But a 92% naked wouldn't make much of a difference..?

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admittance. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: a
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:59 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1047
Location:
Greece
at lvl 80 int pure need to be 96%


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:54 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 940
Location:
Xian
At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admittance. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:08 am 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2979
Location: Playin' Talkin'
Penguin13 wrote:
At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.


No thats not true. At lower levels pure int can't be 96% mag balance

_________________
Image


Niyoke wrote:
err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:32 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 536
Location:
Azteca
MrBow wrote:
Penguin13 wrote:
At any decent level (above like, 20 I believe is when you start getting a steady %), pure int IS 96%, not needs to be, IS.


No thats not true. At lower levels pure int can't be 96% mag balance


wat lvl will a pure int reach 92% mag balance/?

_________________
ISRO [Azteca]Helena lvl 56 wiz/cleric


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group