|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
raphaell666
|
Post subject: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:22 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 1536 Location: Anywhere.
|
[GUIDE] European Subclasses. This guide has some ideas about subclasses for each primary class you can take with a european. You can take a look at it before posting, but do not post in here criticizing or refering to that guide. Its only for ideas or w/e. The discussion here is of informal kind. This topic has the purpose of being part of an organized, coordinated discussion on different European Subclasses. There will be several more topics like this one, all about european classes. Please, only post after thinking. DO NOT POST INCONCLUSIVE REPLIES. If you think you know what you are going to talk about, do the following: Vote on the poll, and then post why you chose that specific subclass for that primary class. Also, do not refrain from stepping out from the frame. Provide new, original ideas of your own. Post why you think they would work, and a whole array of unique builds might come into light. Try not asking many questions here, unless they are somewhat related to the discussion. Flaming WILL NOT be necessary. If you are sure that someone posted shit, report it, and let the mods take care of that. But please, do argue with others, we do want a discussion, a debate, but try to refrain from flaming.
_________________ << banned for remaking a banned account. -cin >>
Last edited by raphaell666 on Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
noobert mclagg
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:46 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 1165 Location: Kittyland
|
Cleric or wiz. As I said for cleric, bad would be best for parties and a good buffer, and wiz would help damage and would be the king of pve and power lvling.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
BloodOwnzzz
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:22 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 1011 Location: I can't play.
|
Bard is a strong stand alone class but it isn't quite enough. You either add Cleric or you become a Caster primary Bard secondary.
_________________

Wizard/Cleric Guide
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stress
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:24 pm |
|
Ex-Staff |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
|
What do you guys think of warlock? 
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
takolin
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:36 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 4238 Location: Life
|
Stress wrote: What do you guys think of warlock?  I voted lock. Why warlock? For fun.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Disconn3cted
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:42 pm |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 3293 Location: WV, USA
|
If you added warlock you would most likely end up playing warlock more than bard....actually if you added any subclass other than cleric you would most likely end up playing it more than bard.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mefra
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:22 pm |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Holland
|
I'm a Bard/Cleric and I think that's the only way to go with Bard as a main.
With wiz it would be Wizard/Bard instead of Bard/Wizard and Warlock is out of the question. Warlock/Cleric is way better than Warlock/Bard, so why take Bard.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
takolin
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:17 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 4238 Location: Life
|
Mefra wrote: I'm a Bard/Cleric and I think that's the only way to go with Bard as a main.
With wiz it would be Wizard/Bard instead of Bard/Wizard and Warlock is out of the question. Warlock/Cleric is way better than Warlock/Bard, so why take Bard. Because you like being a speedy bastard?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tasdik
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
Forum God |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 13206 Location: Life
|
takolin wrote: Mefra wrote: I'm a Bard/Cleric and I think that's the only way to go with Bard as a main.
With wiz it would be Wizard/Bard instead of Bard/Wizard and Warlock is out of the question. Warlock/Cleric is way better than Warlock/Bard, so why take Bard. Because you like being a speedy bastard? Who doesn't? 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
phulshof
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:20 am |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 1137 Location:
|
Mefra wrote: I'm a Bard/Cleric and I think that's the only way to go with Bard as a main.
With wiz it would be Wizard/Bard instead of Bard/Wizard and Warlock is out of the question. Warlock/Cleric is way better than Warlock/Bard, so why take Bard. I fully agree. Anything other than bard will make bard your subclass, even if it's at the same class level, and even if you have all the useful bard spells. In my opinion, having something as your main class means that's the class you play when you solo, and for bard that implies cleric subclass.
_________________ [88] Vivace Pure INT Bard/Cleric, Bard 88, Cleric 88
[83] Pinokkio Pure INT Force Nuker, Force 83, Cold 83, Lightning 83, Fire 60
[81] Sybian Pure INT KD Nuker, Bicheon 81, Cold 81, Lightning 81, Fire 60
|
|
Top |
|
 |
MrFudge
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:32 am |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 5731 Location: None
|
if you wanted bard as main then bard/warlock is the best. make one and you'll see why.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mefra
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:09 am |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Holland
|
phulshof wrote: Mefra wrote: I'm a Bard/Cleric and I think that's the only way to go with Bard as a main.
With wiz it would be Wizard/Bard instead of Bard/Wizard and Warlock is out of the question. Warlock/Cleric is way better than Warlock/Bard, so why take Bard. I fully agree. Anything other than bard will make bard your subclass, even if it's at the same class level, and even if you have all the useful bard spells. In my opinion, having something as your main class means that's the class you play when you solo, and for bard that implies cleric subclass. Yeah, I use Bard as main and cleric sub. But, if played well you can use them both at the same time. Maybe you won't do that anymore in solo play after lvl 40 (RD), but as for now, I'm just switching weapons all the time.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dmelsie
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:04 pm |
|
Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 9 Location: phillipines
|
Uehara wrote: I'm Bard as main, Wiz as sub. Used both, love both but love bard more.  usually i dont like having a sub and multiple masteries as well.....but i gonna make a bard thanks to you for the overwhelming interest..... and i would go for a cleric sub after i got the 2m sp im planning......but if i cant take the 2m sp or more likely i hit 1m only pure bard my char will become..... our thief activities really need a support.... at the moment only 2 level 90 cleric and no level 90 bard.... so if im going bard/cleric that would be a nice path
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadowfox542
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:51 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 914 Location:
|
Warlock. Debuffs then hit with Bard nukes.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Asteroid
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:07 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 626 Location:
|
Stress wrote: What do you guys think of warlock?  i love warlock hands down and bard too. warlock would start off with debuffs, and then try to stun or put him to sleep and then use bard nukes in pvp. crazy combo!
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Alones
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:05 pm |
|
Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 13 Location: At this one place
|
Bards are the best class they do not need a sub class because they rise over any other class that dares to challenge them
I am one of the few pure bards eat my bard
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Miguez
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:22 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 5003 Location:
|
I didn't vote for any of those since I like Bard with no sub. It's really ok to be a simple Bard, in this huge world.
*Looks at his 1 SP*
Yeah.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Intentions
|
Post subject: Re: Official Bard Subclass Discussion Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:47 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 151 Location:
|
BARDLOCK FTW this is one of the builds you really have to know how to play but generally debuff with warlock quick switch and then nuke bards have the fastest cast so you should drop people pretty fast
_________________ IGN: ItchyBalls Level: 78 FF Build: Blader/Fire-90 68-Ice 52-Lightning Guild:UnHoly
IGN: Intentions Level: 32 Build: Xbow/Bard Guild: Chaotic
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|