Explanation please?

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

I ask this question out of pure curosity, I;m not trying to flame, or troll or start stuff, or w/e.

I was looking through my old posts and I saw the "tedtwillger" (sp?) is banned.

And I think I have seen JKME banned.

Could I please know why?

I ask this because I used to play with them for a bit and I'm curious.

Thanks.

rek · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:30 am

Im not sure about ted, but JKMB was banned for violating some rules.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Ahh, I see, thanks rek.

Blindfire · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 3844 **Location:** ...

On the same general note, why was Crumpets banned?

rek · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:16 am

I wasn't aware of his ban until i saw it in Priams sig, but im pretty sure it was because of being a consistent problem to some people.

:l

imo, i want him unbanned

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:19 am

same.

Melez · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:13 am

About tedwilliger, not sure, but I think it's because he made a really pointless bot accusation.
And Crumpets for arguing with a mod so he got banned (guess which mod.

). Basically, he got banned for not shutting up when told repeatedly. And all in all I myself don't miss him.

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:19 am

meh, everyone knows Crumps likes to argue, so do i, it's not that big of a deal.

His post history around the ban date, shows nothing exceptional. Guess that's deleted.

Just some real clever stuff like:

Quote:

_Lana_ wrote:
Stop acting,you will never be Dom

Crumpets: Haha, made me smile.

Go check post history please. I have always been like this .. Dom used to be care bear. How about you go hop back onto Satman's cock and ride back to India.

Clever stuff.

cin · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:01 am

crumpets was heavily warned several times before
he got banned. basically he was pushing the limits
at least twice a week. sure, he was one of the faces
of srf, and priam, you also know how i feel about
his ban. but rule-wise, his ban was completely legit.
he was banned for a good reason and had it coming for
a long time. so i stand behind his ban 100%.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Priam wrote:

meh, everyone knows Crumps likes to argue, so do i, it's not that big of a deal.

His post history around the ban date, shows nothing exceptional. Guess that's deleted.

Just some real clever stuff like:

Quote:

_Lana_ wrote:
Stop acting,you will never be Dom

Crumpets: Haha, made me smile.

Go check post history please. I have always been like this .. Dom used to be care bear. How about you go hop back onto Satman's cock and ride back to India.

Clever stuff.

Reading that, reminds me of him, and TBH I hope he doesn't come back.

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:05 pm

Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.

He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.

Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.

Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.

cin · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:16 pm

as you said, it's all in your eyes. not banning him
after so many warnings would be playing favourites.
we've let him try to keep it down a bit, like not use
the personal attacks, but he decided he could do what
he wanted. and it cost him. new members have as much
right to be here as old members.

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:50 pm

never said they didn't, just that some members have the right to burn their asses, as they deserve it in most cases.

Ryoko · **Joined:** Dec 2005 **Posts:** 6390 **Location:**

Poor treatment toward new users is one of the worst, in my eyes.

We want the forum to grow.

The statue of liberty is holding a torch to light the way, not a machine gun to keep out people we might not like

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Priam wrote:

Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.

He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.

Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.

Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.

What's with you and penises in this post?

So was ted banned because of his bot accusations and their uselessness?

Priam · **Posted:** Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:57 am

I like cocks in that post, doh.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Vinyl is bann'd nao?

Fury · **Joined:** Jan 2008 **Posts:** 1596 **Location:**

Bout time.

Priam · **Posted:** Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:44 am

Well, i just read the thread, He kind off asked for it.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Which thread was it?

Fury · **Joined:** Jan 2008 **Posts:** 1596 **Location:**

Like..every single thread he posted in? lol

Priam · **Posted:** Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:24 am

CloudStrider wrote:

Which thread was it?

viewtopic.php?f=12&t=113435

and several others.

Melez · **Posted:** Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:44 am

Thank God, he was flame baiting in every single post of his.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Yeah, he deserved it.

Ryoko · **Joined:** Dec 2005 **Posts:** 6390 **Location:**

Your sig quote is terrible. Btw.

fckerr · **Joined:** Mar 2008 **Posts:** 1914 **Location:** Bulgaria

Im sure Crumpets is lurking around

And for JKME, he posted banned user's message.

CloudStrider · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 2125 **Location:** Away

Ryoko wrote:

Your sig quote is terrible. Btw.

It's more for memories, kind of a inside joke.

Doppleganger · **Posted:** Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:07 am

Has no one thought about a reform in these policies yet?
There are going to be flames that's a given without them this place would freeze over, they keep this place toasty warm and a lot of the time there deserved. The concept of banning someone that uses a loader for 7 days is hilariously absurd and the fact that it's been going this long is ridiculous. They get to come back and yet there still using it so what was the point? I see absolutely no logic in that. This needs to be reversed.
You give the temporary bans to the people that cause a forest fire and you give the permanent bans to the people that use 3rd pt programs. At least when a person gets a temporary ban for flames they would come back and remember that they got a temporary ban and they'll think twice in causing another major fire. You give them warnings but giving them a short temporary ban is more effective.
Code: Select all

Basically

Priam · **Posted:** Thu Jul 16, 2009 2:22 pm

I agree with Doppleganger on the temp ban thing.

Kirkaldi · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 3083 **Location:** nyc

Priam wrote:

Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.

He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.

Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.

Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.

you too.

Silkroad Online Forums

Explanation please?

Who is online