JoyMax banning

marijnz0r · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:54 pm

Bot punishment list:

1st: 572 accounts
2nd: 145 accounts
3rd: 26 accounts

It looks to me like they are actually doing something...
Let's hope they will keep on going and even more punishments on daily base!

pr0klobster · **Joined:** Oct 2007 **Posts:** 1427 **Location:**

Seen it before, I won't hold my breath that they will continue.

TheKnight · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 3067 **Location:**

Is there any proofs that those guys are actually banned?
In kSro they said they banned bots and then unbanned at the end of the day -.-"

CeLL · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:13 pm

is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?

Gladiator_RN · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:24 pm

Joymax is never gonna ban the silk buying bots, believe me. Not permanently. They might try to ban all these gold bots but they will come back anyway.

fckerr · **Joined:** Mar 2008 **Posts:** 1914 **Location:** Bulgaria

Fake or real bans,there isnt any result in server traffic. :banghead:

Strwarrior · **Joined:** Oct 2008 **Posts:** 3799 **Location:** ....

ofy1993 wrote:

"Those who cannot learn from history are bound to repeat it."

Don't get your hopes up. Use the search button.

Honestly, no kidding, read the history in Srf. You will learn a lot from it about how Joymax "bans" bots.

+1, i still remember these days when we was saying "omg 80k bots banned", now they are 500...

there is no difference, those who got banned are those stupids who use wrong opcodes.

aishsharma · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:46 pm

the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"

but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

CeLL wrote:

is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?:

CeLL · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:07 pm

curvekiller wrote:

CeLL wrote:

is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?:

Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something

so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.

Strwarrior · **Joined:** Oct 2008 **Posts:** 3799 **Location:** ....

aishsharma wrote:

the 572 ppl probbly had chars like: "asghasd" or "asjkdghads" and ofcourse "zjhgkvhasd"

but i bet that sdhgsd, sdufygsdf and sdligcv will take their place 5 minutes after the client is up agn...or if its up already

lol

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

CeLL wrote:

curvekiller wrote:

CeLL wrote:

is there any proof they still play or are affected by this ban?

Uh, uh, uh, spelling error.

OnTopic: This is nothing. Just another random detection by their fail automatic system.
We had a good ban once, 25000 first ban, but that was gone after a week, too, so :?:

Affect
1. influence somebody or something
to act upon or have an effect on somebody or something

so i gues i should have said
"is there any proof they still play or that this will have an effect on them."
not so much spelling as grammar.

Yes, you can say "Is there any proof they still lay or that this will affect them?", too.
Btw, i'm from Germany

and currently in the US as an exchange student lol.

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

CeLL · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:57 pm

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.

.AWAKE. · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 2070 **Location:**

CeLL wrote:

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.

my thoughts exactly..

majincooler · **Joined:** Apr 2008 **Posts:** 579 **Location:**

.AWAKE. wrote:

CeLL wrote:

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.

my thoughts exactly..

There isn't a community anymore. Don't you see it's the same 10-15 users posting in almost all the topics? Silkroad is dead, hence these forums are dead. If MOD can show us statistics about how many posts, topics, registered users per day go through Silkroad-related sections, I m pretty sure you ll be convinced, or atleast know that its nowhere near how it was before.

.AWAKE. · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 2070 **Location:**

that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..

majincooler · **Joined:** Apr 2008 **Posts:** 579 **Location:**

.AWAKE. wrote:

that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..

I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.

dom · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:42 pm

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

+1

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

dom wrote:

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

+1

omagawd, all the mods hate us

CeLL · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:44 pm

majincooler wrote:

.AWAKE. wrote:

that totally justifies the MODS bashing the only remaining community they have left on there forums..

I am not creating a justification. I m just highlighting the part where CeLL said the entire community, he made it sound like as if we were hundreds of active posters in an interactive community.

i didnt make it look like anyhthing, that is simply how you precieved it. it doesnt matter if it were 5 people, its still a little rude.

and @ AWAKE they have otl dont forget.

dom · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:50 pm

curvekiller wrote:

dom wrote:

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

+1

omagawd, all the mods hate us

http://pan-am.uniserve.com/pg000005.htm

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

Still want to kill me?

dom · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:55 pm

TheKnight · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 3067 **Location:**

dom wrote:

Thats just like my pet rabbit, died 1 year ago

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

Edit: My pet died 1 year ago, too :cry:

.

Swindler · **Posted:** Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm

Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny

TheKnight · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 3067 **Location:**

HejsaN wrote:

Is this like selfmade pictures? They're not funny

hmm...maybe we should go back to topic itself indeed...

Moar bunnys!

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

CeLL wrote:

Barotix wrote:

I swear, SRO players are a sorry lot of abused & gullible gamers.

thank you for bashing the entire community for which you moderate forums.

np, anytime broski.

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

CeLL wrote:

is there any proof they still play or are effected by this ban?

+1. I'll start believing it more when active leaders of big botting guilds are banned permanently. I'll really know something GREAT is happening when entire botting guilds, or even 2/3rds, are banned from a server.

Silkroad Online Forums

JoyMax banning

Who is online