Would you pay for subscribtion if it cleaned up sro?

Matrixman__ · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 773 **Location:**

i would only play this game as "pay to play" if it was less than $25 USD/month, but you get 100% login, no bots, you get a free unlimited squirrel (or monkey, wutever), and you get 100% bonus exp and spexp all the time (like having a GT running continously), the rest of the item mall would be over and above the $25/month fee

Vandall · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 1923 **Location:**

Matrixman__ wrote:

i would only play this game as "pay to play" if it was less than $25 USD/month, but you get 100% login, no bots, you get a free unlimited squirrel (or monkey, wutever), and you get 100% bonus exp and spexp all the time (like having a GT running continously), the rest of the item mall would be over and above the $25/month fee

wouldnt it be pointless for everyone to have the whole GT thing...u wouldnt see any difference

Wizard_EG · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 191 **Location:**

All silk buyers votes YES
non silk buyers voted NO

Death2U · **Posted:** Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:41 am

buster5995 wrote:

Sorry if this is already a topic with a poll...but i coudlnt find one and want to know general feel.

If joymax said tomorrow from july 27th SRO will no longer be F2P, and was now P2P, would you pay to play?

I would. Hopefully that way they could start to employ more people..WAY more gm's...fix up chat to make more user friendly...get rid of gold advertising in all citys on every server...MUCH better bot protection and bannning statagies...

what do u think...?

The game is already perfect minus gold farming bots and low server capacity

Manowar · **Posted:** Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:45 am

double post

Manowar · **Posted:** Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:45 am

Death2U wrote:

The game is already perfect minus gold farming bots and low server capacity

You forgot to mention player bots as well.

I would definitely play this game if it was p2p if the customer service was much better, as well as the big problems were fixed.

Death2U · **Posted:** Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:48 am

Double Post FTL

And no, player bots aren't the problem. They will take up a slot in the server regardless. It's the gold farmers using clientless bots that's the problem.

There are cool legits and cool player botters, as well as their are asshole legits and asshole player botters.

It seems like your prejudice has kept you from making good friends in this game. I've seen the good sides of everyone... so I don't hate a group as a whole b/c of the actions of a few

Manowar · **Posted:** Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:19 am

Death2U wrote:

Double Post FTL

And no, player bots aren't the problem. They will take up a slot in the server regardless. It's the gold farmers using clientless bots that's the problem.

There are cool legits and cool player botters, as well as their are asshole legits and asshole player botters.

It seems like your prejudice has kept you from making good friends in this game. I've seen the good sides of everyone... so I don't hate a group as a whole b/c of the actions of a few

Player bots are definitely a big problem with the game and I'm sure anyone that truly plays this game legitly will agree with that.

It is bad enough that they use a 3rd party program to gain a level advantage because they can grind 24/7 with one but it's worse when you're near or at cap and most of them have sosun equipment that they either spent with gold they didn't earn because they got the gold through botting or bought by buying gold or got a sosun drop from leaving their bot on. Sure it's possible for a legit to be able to get a few sosun items, but not near the full sosun sets that many player bots have.

Also i never said i hated player bots to where i would never be friends with someone just because they did bot because i have met plenty of friendly people that use bots and are friends with. I just believe that if you're going to play the game at least play it fairly which is my problem with player bots.

Overcome · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 180 **Location:**

I would cut myself. (You can join me if you want MrFudge)

allinmustwin · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 82 **Location:** usa

YES I WOULD I ALREADY PAY FOR A PREMIUM JUST TO LOG ON SO WTF hate them bots with a passion. Always great after the inspection every week when i get a whole half hour with out them
Whats the point of farming when there are 10 bots around that area. KS you/ you KS them just to compete

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

SRO wont improve untill it will be bought by an other company, like Blizzard/ EA games, because JoyMax made this game to make as much profit as they can without thinking of the people who actually play this game.

And believe me when i say that JoyMax can fix the BOT problem in like one day if they wished so, but they wont, and i'll let you figger out why they wont...

sheeplol5 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 773 **Location:**

Wizard_EG wrote:

All silk buyers votes YES
non silk buyers voted NO

im not a silk buyer but i would pay one off. exept i might just go play WoW because theres no monthly, more players, less bots, more support, more expansions, More weapons, less slow levelling (but tbf the levelling in SRO will make easier levelling games seem like a cakewalk and you can get tough in no-time =D) WoW is like 10 times better than SRO BUT its $50 and that aint cheap for a 14 year old like me

but apparently it owns your life so i might not bother goin on it

Blurred · **Joined:** Nov 2006 **Posts:** 2894 **Location:**

joymax ALREADY gets alot of money, what will be the difference? If they cant clean it up now..........

sheeplol5 · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 773 **Location:**

Overcome wrote:

I would cut myself. (You can join me if you want MrFudge)

im sorry, you missed fudge, hes already done it anyway because he accidentally cut his whole arm off trying to put butter on his sandwich

Silkroad Online Forums

Would you pay for subscribtion if it cleaned up sro?

Who is online