Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:17 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4757
Location:
Off Topic
Valkasdar wrote:
Ok this is my last statement about america nad ww 2 in this topic.

For me america is guilty for what was done back in the end of ww2. Nothing cant justify a death of thousands of ppl... If there is something to do it then Hitler isnt wrong for killing so many.

Cant you all understand this ? A DEATH OF HUMAN CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED !
Is it so damn hard ?


So a US marine kills a nazi soldier. That isn't justified? if your going to the extremes, then war itself shouldn't be justified either.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:17 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9250
Location: Sand
Valkasdar wrote:
Barotix wrote:
Ignore Valkasdar he has shown his ignorance many, many, many times.


Ignore Barotix he have nothing to say.


Dude, its not like I'm lying. You don't know anything about American history, you just make generalizations. You can't back up any of your arguments and you're a Fundamentalist in all your arguments. You think America is the only country that does War, and when someone calls your bullshit then proves it bullshit, you ask pointless rhetorical questions.
As i said, you have shown your ignorance, many, many, many, times and because of that anything you type carries little weight in these types of arguments.

Stop arguing from a "I hate America for no logical reason" point of view, and argue from a Non - Biased observer point of View. I don't retract my statement.

_________________
Maddening
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:19 pm 
Addicted Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2629
Location:
Off Topic
Barotix wrote:
Stop arguing from a "I hate America for no logical reason" point of view, and argue from a Non - Biased observer point of View. I don't retract my statement.

Alright, I'm not the one to call him out on that -.-

_________________
XemnasXD wrote:
also im not going to stop calling him a cosmic douche, anyone that knows everything about everything, then creates you knowing full you won't end up following the rules he's made up for you, then punishes you for all eternity for it....come on...thats just being a d*ck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:50 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1734
Location: L-A-B
This topic needs a serious cleaning....my points got lost in this kids random incoherent spewings of ignorance.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:03 am 
Chronicle Writer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9841
Location: US - Illidan
After reading Vindicators post i can see how someone could justify the bomb. However using the same facts in a different light could easily make a strong argument against dropping the bomb. This is a personal issue now as im sure it was back then seeing as the ppl who invented the bomb didn't want it used. No right or wrong answers as always, just different perspectives...im done here i think this has reached its climax, all the facts have been put out there and anyone capable of making a valid opinion has probably already made one...i stand by my side though but i realize theres more than one side to issue and i have vin and reise among others to thank for that....
/end

_________________
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:46 am 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1734
Location: L-A-B
True, there is no real answer as from different angles it can be seen differently. In the interest of American lives and a quick end to the war, yes it is justified, however on a more humanitarian stand point, I don't think it was. I think many people here fail to realize the true impact an atomic bomb can have.

Quote:
The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by The Manhattan Engineer District, June 29, 1946.
Both the Hiroshima and the Nagasaki atomic bombs exhibited similar effects.
The damages to man-made structures and other inanimate objects was the result in both cities of the following effects of the explosions:
A. Blast, or pressure wave, similar to that of normal explosions.
B. Primary fires, i.e., those fires started instantaneously by the heat radiated from the atomic explosion.
C. Secondary fires, i.e., those fires resulting from the collapse of buildings, damage to electrical systems, overturning of stoves, and other primary effects of the blast.
D. Spread of the original fires (B and C) to other structures.

The casualties sustained by the inhabitants of both cities were due to:

A. "Flash" burns, caused directly by the almost instantaneous radiation of heat and light at the moment of the explosion.
B. Burns resulting from the fires caused by the explosion.
C. Mechanical injuries caused by collapse of buildings, flying debris, and forceable hurling - about of persons struck by the blast pressure waves.
D. Radiation injuries caused by the instantaneous penetrating radiation (in many respects similar to excessive X-ray exposure) from the nuclear explosion; all of these effective radiations occurred during the first minute after initiation of the explosion, and nearly all occurred during the first second of the explosion.

The central portions of the cities underneath the explosions suffered almost complete destruction. The only surviving objects were the frames of a small number of strong reinforced concrete buildings which were not collapsed by the blast; most of these buildings suffered extensive damage from interior fires, had their windows, doors, and partitions knocked out, and all other fixtures which were not integral parts of the reinforced concrete frames burned or blown away; the casualties in such buildings near the center of explosion were almost 100%. In Hiroshima fires sprang up simultaneously all over the wide flat central area of the city; these fires soon combined in an immense "fire storm" (high winds blowing inwards toward the center of a large conflagration) similar to those caused by ordinary mass incendiary raids; the resulting terrific conflagration burned out almost everything which had not already been destroyed by the blast in a roughly circular area of 4.4 square miles around the point directly under the explosion (this point will hereafter in this report be referred to as X). Similar fires broke out in Nagasaki, but no devastating fire storm resulted as in Hiroshima because of the irregular shape of the city.

In both cities the blast totally destroyed everything within a radius of 1 mile from the center of explosion, except for certain reinforced concrete frames as noted above. The atomic explosion almost completely destroyed Hiroshima's identity as a city. Over a fourth of the population was killed in one stroke and an additional fourth seriously injured, so that even if there had been no damage to structures and installations the normal city life would still have been completely shattered. Nearly everything was heavily damaged up to a radius of 3 miles from the blast, and beyond this distance damage, although comparatively light, extended for several more miles. Glass was broken up to 12 miles.

In Nagasaki, a smaller area of the city was actually destroyed than in Hiroshima, because the hills which enclosed the target area restricted the spread of the great blast; but careful examination of the effects of the explosion gave evidence of even greater blast effects than in Hiroshima. Total destruction spread over an area of about 3 square miles. Over a third of the 50,000 buildings in the target area of Nagasaki were destroyed or seriously damaged. The complete destruction of the huge steel works and the torpedo plant was especially impressive. The steel frames of all buildings within a mile of the explosion were pushed away, as by a giant hand, from the point of detonation. The badly burned area extended for 3 miles in length. The hillsides up to a radius of 8,000 feet were scorched, giving them an autumnal appearance.


Quote:
Memorandum discussed with the President, April 25, 1945
Source: Henry Stimson Diary, Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library, Henry Lewis Stimson Papers (microfilm at Library of Congress)


5. The world in its present state of moral advancement compared with its technical development would be eventually at the mercy of such a weapon. In other words, modern civilization might be completely destroyed.

6. To approach any world peace organization of any pattern now likely to be considered, without and appreciation by the leaders of our country of the power of this new weapon, would seem to be unrealistic. No system of control heretofore considered would be adequate to control this menace. Both inside any particular county and between the nations on the world, the control of this weapon will undoubtedly be a matter of the greatest difficulty and would involve such thorough-going rights of inspection and internal controls as we have never heretofore contemplated.

7. Furthermore, in the light of our present position with reference to this weapon, the question of sharing it with other nations and, if so shared, upon what terms, becomes a primary question of our foreign relations. Also our leadership in the war and in the development of this weapon has places a certain moral responsibility upon which we cannot shirk without very serious responsibility for any disaster to civilization which it would further.

8. In the other hand, if the problem of the proper use of this weapon can be solved, we would have the opportunity to bring the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our civilization can be saved.

9. As stated in general Groves’ report, steps are under way looking towards the establishment of a select committee of particular qualifications for recommending action to the Executive and legislative branches of our government when the secrecy is no longer in full effect. The committee would also recommend the actions to be taken by the War Department prior to that time in anticipation of the postwar problems. All recommendations would of course be first submitted to the president.


In my research when i wrote a paper, I kept an unbiased view point as best as possible, therefore I can build a rather strong position for not dropping the bomb. However in my opinion, it was more justified than not.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:04 am 
Forum Legend
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7129
Location:
Venus
if germany had created two nukes before us and then used them on a british city and an american city, and then go on to lose the war, the germans responsible, even the pilots that flew the bombers, would've been condemned for crimes against humanity and would've been executed following the nuremberg trials.

all this "saving lives" bs is so funny. yes, kill ppl to save ppl, yup, makes sense. :roll:

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:12 am 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1734
Location: L-A-B
TOloseGT wrote:
if germany had created two nukes before us and then used them on a british city and an american city, and then go on to lose the war, the germans responsible, even the pilots that flew the bombers, would've been condemned for crimes against humanity and would've been executed following the nuremberg trials.

all this "saving lives" bs is so funny. yes, kill ppl to save ppl, yup, makes sense. :roll:


To someone with understanding of the concept and issues at hand, it does make sense. If the 9/11 hijackers were killed before they carried out their plan, thousands of lives would have been saved...by killing a few men. Same logic applies here. Bomb two japanese cities, kill hundreds of people, save thousands more that would have died during the land invasion. Very easy to understand if you know anything about the subject.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:24 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2119
Location:
Off Topic
Vindicator wrote:
TOloseGT wrote:
if germany had created two nukes before us and then used them on a british city and an american city, and then go on to lose the war, the germans responsible, even the pilots that flew the bombers, would've been condemned for crimes against humanity and would've been executed following the nuremberg trials.

all this "saving lives" bs is so funny. yes, kill ppl to save ppl, yup, makes sense. :roll:


To someone with understanding of the concept and issues at hand, it does make sense. If the 9/11 hijackers were killed before they carried out their plan, thousands of lives would have been saved...by killing a few men. Same logic applies here. Bomb two japanese cities, kill hundreds of people, save thousands more that would have died during the land invasion. Very easy to understand if you know anything about the subject.


How do you calculate that more people would have died that the amount of civilians the U.S. killed with the bombs? It's speculation and there's no real way you can prove that. The question is would more civilians have died without the bombings, soldiers on the other hand are supposed to fight and military casualties are a part of war.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:14 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 867
Location:
Off Topic
Valkasdar wrote:
I think this debat is useless... some of you even change the whole history :D nvm this.
You cannot change anything with this debat its endless, you cannot make me thinking america is powerful or great... no one can not make me thing america is not guilty for what happens in Japan or what is happening now.
All we do in this threat is giving facts and facts... and more facts and all this facts is faceing that America killed milions of ppl with no reason after the war is over. Hitler have some reason after all he hates them lol (joke..) so imo america = hitler there is no differenses.
wow

Some of the Euro rhetoric that comes out of your mouth makes sense. I would tend to agree that it is morally wrong to kill and especially wrong to kill civilians. This isn't to say that it can't be justified, of course it can. What else does every country have officials for anyway? But then... you go and say something like this, Valkasdar. Can you not see that such inflammatory language dismisses any credibility that you may have had?

Hyperbole has its purpose. Overstatement can be used to make a point. You seem to be pretty good at exaggeration where you cast things into the extreme. Your point that "All Killing is Evil therefore America = Hitler" is but one example. But you are speaking of things over which you can exert zero control.

Might I challenge you to do something that will be very unfamiliar to you? Turn your thoughts toward things that you can control. And while you do this, reverse the habit of overstatement of thinking about things in very large scale. Notice that our universe is indeed huge, the stars cannot be accurately counted there are so many. But notice also that the world we live in is also comprised of things that are very, very small.

This is the essence of our topic, THE ATOM BOMB. Consider that the atomic explosion that we are discussing came from fission of an ATOM. In as much as you say "All killing is evil" so also is all forms of giving offense to others. One does not have to slaughter millions to become an offender. Offender status comes from lack of understanding and then acting on it.

Instead of trying to provoke as many as possible about something that is outside your control, instead... do something you can exert control on (with practice). Speak well without giving offense.

Sure, it's a small thing and probably something you are not familiar with, maybe even scared of, but remember what power can come from small things, yes?

_________________
Click ~~> SRO GUIDE 4 Newbs
Image


Last edited by Grandpa on Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:09 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2979
Location: Playin' Talkin'
Haven't read all.. but this is my opinion.
Yes. It stopped the war.

_________________
Image


Niyoke wrote:
err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:22 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4025
Location:
Guildwars2
There's a lot of things you should put into consideration. First of all, it was a different era; people had a different perspective of the world and other nations. Second, Japan wasn't exactly the same as what it is today. The Japanese people, much like Nazi Germany citizens, were very nationalistic to the point where they believed that they are superior in comparison to others. Thus, giving themselves the permission to invade, colonize, enslave, rob, and rape citizens of other nations. In addition to that, if the United States did not use the A-Bomb on Japan, America would have to sacrifice an exponential amount of soldiers (better them than us). Besides, the majority of Japanese citizens at the height of WWII were not what I would call "innocent civilians" since the Japanese Government actually trained everyone (including women and children) to use weapons in order to kill any attackers. Although a few people might argue that Japan would've surrendered even without the bomb, we still can't be sure of that. In addition, an earlier surrender could have also meant that more POWs have been saved from death. However, it is incontrovertible that there was more to the use of the Atomic Bomb; yes, politics. Not only did it give the Allied nations a boost of morale but it also placed America on the map as a well-known world superpower.

(I went to a history school for three years =p)

_________________
Image
ImageAlastor Crow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:47 pm 
Site Contributor
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4474
Location:
Off Topic
Funny thing is, We dropped One A-Bomb at one time, they we're but wipes and were all like "hahaha ur crazy american, you have no gits to bomb us again you stupid red neck yanks" and we were all like "oh no u didnt, bomb the hell out those lil mother F*****s" then the second one was dropped and they were like "OH SH*T" CRAZY AMERICANS BOOM US, AHHHHH GODZILLA!"
har har har, the whole story from head to toe ^_^

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:24 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2133
Location: .........
Jstar1 wrote:
the atomic bombs are justified, we would have had so many dead people if we made a landing attempt with soldiers. like d-day, only difference is that there are civilians running at you with sticks


Oh common, you think only about yourself.

Americans COULD loose lots of soldiers, and Japan did it, and not only soldiers, but most important, civilians.

If America is strongest, with strongest military, why not crush enemy in other ways? like destroying their military, not whole cities. And some ppl say Japan had weak military. Thats funny, strongest military on planet used a-bombs against his weak enemy. America was scared...worried, confused, call ir how you want, but strongest military would invade country, and finish job by "hands", not a-bombs.

But the bombs were dropped. Everything ended quickly. I'm not against america, i dont hate them, i'm not calling americans guilty...but for what americans did in the past, and this days (Japan,S.America,Africa,Europe,Asia) i have no respect for them, america is total 0 for me. But thats just my opinion.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:59 pm 
Regular Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 252
Location:
Troy
^^ so we should sacrifice thousands maybe millions of our own soldiers lives just so we can flex our muscles
and say "we dont use any of that pussy bomb shit"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:52 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4757
Location:
Off Topic
deep.in wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:
the atomic bombs are justified, we would have had so many dead people if we made a landing attempt with soldiers. like d-day, only difference is that there are civilians running at you with sticks


but for what americans did in the past, and this days (Japan,S.America,Africa,Europe,Asia) i have no respect for them, america is total 0 for me. But thats just my opinion.


this is why you anti-americans are so uneducated and uninformed. And thats how it is with nearly all haters. Japan was just like germany, they were brainwashed into thinking their country was the greatest and all that blah blah.

The government called on ALL their people to arm themselves with spears and train middle schoolers to stab at american effigys. The entire country was ready to do battle. If america had invaded using conventional weaponry, I guarentee that the japanese civilians would be slaughtered.

Plus we were planning just one nuke to make them surrender, and when they didn't we dropped a 2nd. The army was preparing a third when Japan surrendered.

2 nukes is better than having 9 or 10 coastal cities being invaded like d-day and the places becoming massacres and building razed and shit.

And the Japanese brought their own downfall, they should have listened in the first place to surrender.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:55 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9250
Location: Sand
deep.in wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:
the atomic bombs are justified, we would have had so many dead people if we made a landing attempt with soldiers. like d-day, only difference is that there are civilians running at you with sticks


Oh common, you think only about yourself.

Americans COULD loose lots of soldiers, and Japan did it, and not only soldiers, but most important, civilians.

If America is strongest, with strongest military, why not crush enemy in other ways? like destroying their military, not whole cities. And some ppl say Japan had weak military. Thats funny, strongest military on planet used a-bombs against his weak enemy. America was scared...worried, confused, call ir how you want, but strongest military would invade country, and finish job by "hands", not a-bombs.

But the bombs were dropped. Everything ended quickly. I'm not against america, i dont hate them, i'm not calling americans guilty...but for what americans did in the past, and this days (Japan,S.America,Africa,Europe,Asia) i have no respect for them, america is total 0 for me. But thats just my opinion.


And Russia is spiritual awesomeness /sarcasm.

_________________
Maddening
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Should the U.S. Have Dropped the A-Bomb?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:32 pm 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2188
Location: Canada
drop all the A-Z bombs :D

but seriously, if US didnt drop it, japan remain ignorant and fight (based on the japanese warrior code of honor (i think))

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group