|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
AngelMare
|
Post subject: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:13 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 639 Location:
|
Hmm , so .. i was walking home from mac' today , and i passed by our local net cafe ( alot people play sro there ) so , there was loza , some person from red sea who was so silent before he find the sun lvl 76 sword now he sounds like the most pro ever , so .. i was tellin my friend i delvled Light for bicheon , so he laughted and said u delvled light ? u are so stupid , he got a high pitch so i wasnt able to argue with him about his points , but i want to show u guys why Fire is better than Lightning .
P.S : My build is 90 fire/bicheon/cold and 30 lightning .
Lets talk about the Cons first of losing Light . 1. Losing Parry ratio from passive and concentration , but i think on adding 40% parry ratio to each piece of ur gear u will get that much , and the pros u get is much better . 2. light nukes are good , specially in training , they r just large ranged , but in the end fire nukes are better . 3. Grass walk , oh well @.@ , and phatom walk is sometimes useful against euro , but u have a low % grass walk anyway , or u can just use drugs xD .
- Pros :
1. u may say Lightning embue cauze electric shock , and thus decrease parry ratio , thats why having fire helps , if u have ur accessory with shock resistance and fire shield king ur immune to it , and ur immune to alot of states , which is pretty helpful if ur vsing someone with light , and u get high dmg and burn which other players without fire wont be immune to . 2. At level 90 , Piercing force gives u 18%? ( i think ) magical damage increase , while at level 30 u get 10% , so u r down 8 %? fire embue + fire nukes give u pretty much more damage , i see with myself when i compare my nuke damage to another lightning nuker . 3. using weapon skills , u have Flame body , and the passive which is great add on to ur physical attack power , Draska in our server ( no sun , just +7 s/s ) does KLAIN ( hybrid spear prrety strong too ^^ ) like 8k while klain have his mana shield on with the demon blade force knock down , isnt that pretty much ? so it boosts up ur physical attack ( he kills klain tho klain have sun +7 spear , fire defence ftw =P ). 4. u have fire and cold defence buffs , so ur more able to defend urself when it comes to other ints . 5. Fire wall is useful when u need to b*tch with some euro wizards who have life turnover. 6. stealth and invisible detection , if urnt gonna buy detection pots xD
at least thats from my point of view ^^ wat do u guys think ?.
_________________


- quit sro.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CloudStrider
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:18 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 2125 Location: Away
|
Best S/S Nuker -- 90 Cold/Light/Bicheon 30 Heuk
*My Opinion*
This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild
_________________
penfold1992 wrote: durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S
 Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Makaveli
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:21 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 198 Location:
|
CloudStrider wrote: Best S/S Nuker -- 90 Cold/Light/Bicheon 30 Heuk
*My Opinion*
This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild 30 heuk only for passive?? NO sense rather take 30 fire for imuum 
_________________ There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CloudStrider
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:23 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 2125 Location: Away
|
Makaveli wrote: CloudStrider wrote: Best S/S Nuker -- 90 Cold/Light/Bicheon 30 Fire/Force
*My Opinion*
This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild 30 heuk only for passive?? NO sense rather take 30 fire for imuum  Opps, sorry, your right. Or 30 Froce?
_________________
penfold1992 wrote: durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S
 Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
MMO_Doug
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:31 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 122 Location:
|
Makaveli wrote: CloudStrider wrote: Best S/S Nuker -- 90 Cold/Light/Bicheon 30 Heuk
*My Opinion*
This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild 30 heuk only for passive?? NO sense rather take 30 fire for imuum  Fire 30 gives u only a little immune.. Pacheon with its att rating increase is way more useful, especially for a pure int cuz of the high dmg
_________________ <<banned from SRF for proof of botting. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Makaveli
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:36 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 198 Location:
|
MMO_Doug wrote: Makaveli wrote: CloudStrider wrote: Best S/S Nuker -- 90 Cold/Light/Bicheon 30 Heuk
*My Opinion*
This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild 30 heuk only for passive?? NO sense rather take 30 fire for imuum  Fire 30 gives u only a little immune.. Pacheon with its att rating increase is way more useful, especially for a pure int cuz of the high dmg mmm, What u mean by little..? on all Accessory 20% ice, should be good tough
_________________ There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
AngelMare
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:42 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 639 Location:
|
Quote: mmm, What u mean by little..?
on all Accessory 20% ice, should be good tough not enough for 100% emmune . Quote: This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild Fire aint slow , the lightning nuke and fire nuke have almost same cast time , and u will use weapon , so cast time aint that immportant , actually just hell fire and flame wave wide are 2 killers , and so , lightning pros are down , and u can see how much more pros fire got .
_________________


- quit sro.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CloudStrider
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:45 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 2125 Location: Away
|
AngelMare wrote: Quote: mmm, What u mean by little..?
on all Accessory 20% ice, should be good tough not enough for 100% emmune . Quote: This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild Fire aint slow , the lightning nuke and fire nuke have almost same cast time , and u will use weapon , so cast time aint that immportant , actually just hell fire and flame wave wide are 2 killers , and so , lightning pros are down , and u can see how much more pros fire got . Fire is good just I think the best build out there doesn't need it, Light FTW.
_________________
penfold1992 wrote: durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S
 Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
I_R_Powerpuff
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:58 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1158 Location: IRL
|
AngelMare wrote: Quote: mmm, What u mean by little..?
on all Accessory 20% ice, should be good tough not enough for 100% emmune . Quote: This is because fire might give you buffs but it is slow campared to Light and light nuke is only a BIT weaker. Also light gives buffs also plus it has a finisher. Cold = Snow Sheild Fire aint slow , the lightning nuke and fire nuke have almost same cast time , and u will use weapon , so cast time aint that immportant , actually just hell fire and flame wave wide are 2 killers , and so , lightning pros are down , and u can see how much more pros fire got . Fire Shield to lvl 28 gives... 38% reduce. That is more than enough for total immunity. 20+20+20+20 is the total you can get, that is 80% So you only need Fire shield to lvl 11 for it to be possible to be immune. One of my friends is nuker with 30 Fire and he's immune.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Troy_FTW
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:51 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 114 Location:
|
light= 67 more parry at lvl 90 (ok.. so u add 40% blues so what u can have 40% blues with 67 parry)
light= 8%more mag when at 90(from 30) gives u 8% more dmg when using nukes... which means its better than fight
light= speed... no speed ur nothing/phatom aswell
light= u got 2 nukes u can use side to side..
fire.. u lose phy attack.. so what u do more mag attacks..
fire.. u lose mag defs.. so what ur an int char u got enuff
fire.. u can still be immune to ppl at lvl 30masterys
ok... light is better than fire for nukers
_________________
 sun set? maybe?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
HolyPure
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:58 am |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 365 Location: Hotan
|
Quote: 3. Grass walk , oh well @.@ , and phatom walk is sometimes useful against euro , but u have a low % grass walk anyway , or u can just use drugs xD . er, sry but u are playing or babysitting ? i mean u use it all the time nonestop, what u talk about pls, "sometimes usefulL" what u talk about ? u grind or whot?
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:06 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
Troy_FTW wrote: light= 67 more parry at lvl 90 (ok.. so u add 40% blues so what u can have 40% blues with 67 parry)
light= 8%more mag when at 90(from 30) gives u 8% more dmg when using nukes... which means its better than fight
light= speed... no speed ur nothing/phatom aswell
light= u got 2 nukes u can use side to side..
fire.. u lose phy attack.. so what u do more mag attacks..
fire.. u lose mag defs.. so what ur an int char u got enuff
fire.. u can still be immune to ppl at lvl 30masterys
ok... light is better than fire for nukers lmfao your so wrong. 67 more parry at 90... With light 30 you have 40 parry.. so your missing out on wut? 27... ok not much... I have 381 parry ratio and i hve 30% on all my gear blue stat... so if I had 40% id tip 400 parry. That 8% is overall magical damage. 8% isnt even alot... You nuke 1000. With 8% you nuke 1080. OMG THAT IS SO MUCH DIFFERENCE .... wait.. nevermind no its not. Fire has the strongest nukes, AND strongest imbue making it better in a fight. Your nothing without speed? Tell me where speed is good in pvp? You run away cuz your a pussy? No... buy a 100% speed drug for pvp / job / FW and use speed buff during training so you keep your gold. Light 2 nukes side to side? I don't exactly understand your english so I will attempt to counter it. You have flame wave wide that splashes, and flame wave hellfire that penetrates... You can splash and do monster dmg still, penetrate does hell of good dmg too. I can kill ppl with just a penetrate like euros ect. And if you know how to use ur nukes you dont have cool down times and can always have a nuke ready for usage  . And no... have you EVER seen a pure int / hybrid pvp? They do PHYS attacks.. Nukes are when the oppenant has status's or stuns to finish enemys off. Majority of pvps: Physical attacks, mag to finish off.. so yah.. Fire users have 18% phys dmg increase, just like magical have 18%  . In my opinion... ints biggest enemys are OTHER ints. After a 2minute pot fight between snow shields, nukes do the most damage and with low HP? a nuke can kill you fast. I have fought many light users and im not bragging or making shit up... i dominated them. I have a 40% snow shield and them with 53% and I nuked MORE on them then they did me... Id nuke 5-6k and theyd nuke 3-4 lol.. The extra 200 mag defence? Worth it. With lvl 30 light you can get 40 parry and 8% mag increase. I think thats pretty good. Why 30 fire? all you get is immunity. Why not get 30 light, have 40 parry, 8% mag. Have 90 fire, have 171 mag def inc, 18% phy dmg increase, strongest nukes, strongest imbue, immunity, combustions to view stealth enemies if u run out of pills + dont pk2, fire walls to kill annoying warriors who KD / KB. What do you think? Youd rather have a weaker nuke, weaker imbue, 10% more mag increase, speed that you can buy from an NPC, or would you rather have the best nukes, imbue, and STILL have an assload of parry and an assload of buffs.... You pickk. @HolyPure. I have 19 meters of phantom and I don't use it when I train... I just run to mobs... If you think some1s botting cuz how they train, then you sir, are an idiot.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Troy_FTW
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:24 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 114 Location:
|
Backfire wrote: Troy_FTW wrote: light= 67 more parry at lvl 90 (ok.. so u add 40% blues so what u can have 40% blues with 67 parry)
light= 8%more mag when at 90(from 30) gives u 8% more dmg when using nukes... which means its better than fight
light= speed... no speed ur nothing/phatom aswell
light= u got 2 nukes u can use side to side..
fire.. u lose phy attack.. so what u do more mag attacks..
fire.. u lose mag defs.. so what ur an int char u got enuff
fire.. u can still be immune to ppl at lvl 30masterys
ok... light is better than fire for nukers lmfao your so wrong. 67 more parry at 90... With light 30 you have 40 parry.. so your missing out on wut? 27... ok not much... I have 381 parry ratio and i hve 30% on all my gear blue stat... so if I had 40% id tip 400 parry. That 8% is overall magical damage. 8% isnt even alot... You nuke 1000. With 8% you nuke 1080. OMG THAT IS SO MUCH DIFFERENCE .... wait.. nevermind no its not. Fire has the strongest nukes, AND strongest imbue making it better in a fight. Your nothing without speed? Tell me where speed is good in pvp? You run away cuz your a pussy? No... buy a 100% speed drug for pvp / job / FW and use speed buff during training so you keep your gold. Light 2 nukes side to side? I don't exactly understand your english so I will attempt to counter it. You have flame wave wide that splashes, and flame wave hellfire that penetrates... You can splash and do monster dmg still, penetrate does hell of good dmg too. I can kill ppl with just a penetrate like euros ect. And if you know how to use ur nukes you dont have cool down times and can always have a nuke ready for usage  . And no... have you EVER seen a pure int / hybrid pvp? They do PHYS attacks.. Nukes are when the oppenant has status's or stuns to finish enemys off. Majority of pvps: Physical attacks, mag to finish off.. so yah.. Fire users have 18% phys dmg increase, just like magical have 18%  . In my opinion... ints biggest enemys are OTHER ints. After a 2minute pot fight between snow shields, nukes do the most damage and with low HP? a nuke can kill you fast. I have fought many light users and im not bragging or making shit up... i dominated them. I have a 40% snow shield and them with 53% and I nuked MORE on them then they did me... Id nuke 5-6k and theyd nuke 3-4 lol.. The extra 200 mag defence? Worth it. With lvl 30 light you can get 40 parry and 8% mag increase. I think thats pretty good. Why 30 fire? all you get is immunity. Why not get 30 light, have 40 parry, 8% mag. Have 90 fire, have 171 mag def inc, 18% phy dmg increase, strongest nukes, strongest imbue, immunity, combustions to view stealth enemies if u run out of pills + dont pk2, fire walls to kill annoying warriors who KD / KB. What do you think? Youd rather have a weaker nuke, weaker imbue, 10% more mag increase, speed that you can buy from an NPC, or would you rather have the best nukes, imbue, and STILL have an assload of parry and an assload of buffs.... You pickk. @HolyPure. I have 19 meters of phantom and I don't use it when I train... I just run to mobs... If you think some1s botting cuz how they train, then you sir, are an idiot. to bad u dont nuke 1000, its like saying i nuke u for 10dmg.. omg thats 0.80 dmg more!!.. u nuke about 18k on rockys.. that 1440 more dmg.. what i mean by using 2 nukes side by side.. is.. u nuke, nuke again and the other nuke is ready to use again about the parry.. ok im wrong on that but 27 is still a lot, if u dont think 27 parry is a lot then u dont know what parry does. speed u want to be slow at grinding? and maybe people dont have the gold to spend on 100% speed scrolls... FW=2hours..that 4 drugs.. pvp=who knows could be a few hours... job= same as pvp
_________________
 sun set? maybe?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:27 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
Troy_FTW wrote: Backfire wrote: Troy_FTW wrote: light= 67 more parry at lvl 90 (ok.. so u add 40% blues so what u can have 40% blues with 67 parry)
light= 8%more mag when at 90(from 30) gives u 8% more dmg when using nukes... which means its better than fight
light= speed... no speed ur nothing/phatom aswell
light= u got 2 nukes u can use side to side..
fire.. u lose phy attack.. so what u do more mag attacks..
fire.. u lose mag defs.. so what ur an int char u got enuff
fire.. u can still be immune to ppl at lvl 30masterys
ok... light is better than fire for nukers to bad u dont nuke 1000, its like saying i nuke u for 10dmg.. omg thats 0.80 dmg more!!.. u nuke about 18k on rockys.. that 1440 more dmg.. what i mean by using 2 nukes side by side.. is.. u nuke, nuke again and the other nuke is ready to use again about the parry.. ok im wrong on that but 27 is still a lot, if u dont think 27 parry is a lot then u dont know what parry does. speed u want to be slow at grinding? and maybe people dont have the gold to spend on 100% speed scrolls... FW=2hours..that 4 drugs.. pvp=who knows could be a few hours... job= same as pvp I'm giving an example about the nukes lmfao...If you want a pure training build sure do light / fire / ice 90 heuksal or bich 30.. But Im talking about the best PVP build. You do MORE phys attacks in pvp... its proven.. watch any pvp video and you will realize this. You definitely want increase on w/e u use the most. You are pure int you already have a good mag attack. You will want to add to the opposite so you can make it awesome also. And for the 2 nukes side by side... Read what I said. Fire has 3... count it... one, two THREE nukes. I do obviously know what parry does... lmfao..... But picking PARRY? over DAMAGE? Spending a few extra mill for 40% parry blue, and 41%+ parry WHITES on your gear? You cant buy damage, unless of course you buy damage scrolls in item mall. But even so, you can get PARRY scrolls or TRIGGER scrolls from the even for FREE. Imagine that, 30% MORE parry for FREE! I have 380 parry you have 407? Whoopty do my damage > urs so I will take you out even with your 27 parry. And according to your sig, you have 3.6bil gold. 200k for a speed drug lol.. You can get 50% speed scrolls from event, or have a bard buff you with speed if your in party w/ a bard. And PVP? You do NOT need speed in pvp........ You stand. You attack. You kill or be killed. Also, I have never jobbed OR pvp'd for multiple hours but thats just me. i think i pvp an hour straight and thats the most. My trade runs take only 30 minutes so yah for that 
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
piXie_niXie
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:46 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 666 Location:
|
Troy_FTW wrote: light= 67 more parry at lvl 90 (ok.. so u add 40% blues so what u can have 40% blues with 67 parry)not even 67 more like 27
light= 8%more mag when at 90(from 30) gives u 8% more dmg when using nukes... which means its better than fight say 10k nuke without buffs, thats 11800 with 18% and 11000 with 10%, not that big of difference plus with fire u have stronger imbue
light= speed... no speed ur nothing/phatom aswelldrug of typhoon
light= u got 2 nukes u can use side to side..fire u have 2 nukes to use side by side plus u have a fast casting nuke with decent power as finisher
fire.. u lose phy attack.. so what u do more mag attacks..int's with wep skills do more damage than str's with wep skills, cuz the mag att of the imbue increase damage by alot
fire.. u lose mag defs.. so what ur an int char u got enuffnothing is enough, besides all builds use mag attack on chinese and only ones that dont on euro are rouges and warriors
fire.. u can still be immune to ppl at lvl 30masteryscost more to get all 20% than only majority with 20%
ok... light is better than fire for nukers not quite, my preferance is 60light/cold 90 fire/bicheon
_________________ Avalon = Big-Brother
|
|
Top |
|
 |
AngelMare
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:49 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 639 Location:
|
HolyPure wrote: Quote: 3. Grass walk , oh well @.@ , and phatom walk is sometimes useful against euro , but u have a low % grass walk anyway , or u can just use drugs xD . er, sry but u are playing or babysitting ? i mean u use it all the time nonestop, what u talk about pls, "sometimes usefulL" what u talk about ? u grind or whot? i dont use it , i delvled it , so for me its somtimes , please dont use this stupid attitude. Quote: to bad u dont nuke 1000, its like saying i nuke u for 10dmg.. omg thats 0.80 dmg more!!.. u nuke about 18k on rockys.. that 1440 more dmg..
what i mean by using 2 nukes side by side.. is.. u nuke, nuke again and the other nuke is ready to use again
about the parry.. ok im wrong on that but 27 is still a lot, if u dont think 27 parry is a lot then u dont know what parry does.
speed u want to be slow at grinding? and maybe people dont have the gold to spend on 100% speed scrolls... FW=2hours..that 4 drugs.. pvp=who knows could be a few hours... job= same as pvp mmm , am sorry but when i had 2 gap at lvl 90 i used to do like 20~22k dmg on rockies ? i dont have that much int on my set .. and just using a +5 , i know a pure int spear with lightning who dont do that much ^.~ , and i know a fire s/s int with +7 sword and full int on gears who does 25~30k on em , lighting fail >.> and of course 27 r helpful , but u need to give up something , at least to get something better and am really okay with my low % speed to use it wherever , and in important events like fortress or so , just use drugs .
_________________


- quit sro.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JKMB
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:13 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 822 Location:
|
With the parry ratio, u could get blues on ur gear, but its a % no? which logicly means, I may be wrong about this, that it increase ur parry by a % of the orginial amount, say w/o light u have parry 10 and u have a 10% increase, u have parry 11, say with light u have parry 20 and u have a 10% increase, u have parry 22, mabye im wrong about this but if they do indeed stack then light would have considerable benifits with regard to parry ratio then fire.
_________________ * Zeus: JKMD - lvl 77 INT S/S - PvP / inactive Guild: UnitedLegion * Zeus: Soul_Stealer - lvl 82 STR Warlock/Rogue - N/A / retired Guild: N/A * Venus: JKMB - lvl 27 INT S/S - Grinding / inactive Guild: PureEntity * Venus: JKME - lvl 51 STR Warrior/Cleric - Ress'd / active Guild: PureEntity
|
|
Top |
|
 |
sawney
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:32 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 241 Location:
|
How about...............................
90 fire 90 bicheon 60 cold 60 lighting
60 cold with 84 psy deffence incl passive, 40% snow 60 light 59% speed, 19m phantom, 15% mag increase, 54 parry..
_________________ <<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
LivithiuM
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:39 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 305 Location:
|
I do not understand why you think the physical increase from fire is so great for s/s.
You are a pure int char. Your damage comes from magic not physical.
You say you only lose 8% magic damage but recieve 9% physical increase from fire. Ok thats all good but to calculate damage it is all multiplied out.
For starters the physical increase works off the physical damage of your weapon which you should know is very low on a sword but the magical damage on a sword is very high.
Whereas if you had that extra 8% increase from magic it will still be used when you do melee attacks by increasing the damage of your imbue.
I don't agree with your reasoning...
_________________ I am LivithiuM in Guild RetributioN
My First Guide in SRF: How to make easy money and influence people!
Bot List: RedSea Listing of Bots made MURDERER!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Phaidra
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:59 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 1142 Location: Not here
|
Fire is for Strength Light is for INT
It's that simple really.
Piercing Force and Flame Body are great examples of this.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:27 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
Phaidra wrote: Fire is for Strength Light is for INT
It's that simple really.
Piercing Force and Flame Body are great examples of this. lmfao. Fire is better for ints. Better imbue and better nukes.. And its 18% physical, not 9%, kthx. Give me 3 GOOD reasons that light is better. Please do... The only 1 Im coming up with is increased magical damage. BUT listen to this kids, FIRE nukes are STILL stronger even when light is at 30. omg wut did u say? Yah.. Light nukes are STILL weaker then fire nukes, even if you have an 18% increase. So I take that back... I have 0 reasons to pick light. Also @ the person talking about parry, the parry buffs are increased by a number depending on the level of the buff, not an overall percentage. And like I said... spend a few mil or break apart drops... fix your WHITE stats.... Not THAT hard... I have more parry then most ints with lightening because of my white stats.. I have a friend w/ 30 light who has 420 parry cuz all his white %'s are 61% and everything is 40% blue increase... sooo PLEASE tell me wtf lightening is good for? You guys have obviously never seen a fire nuker pvp'n a light nuker. I rock light users with a +0 spear lmfao. The evidence is out there and you guys are just not reading lmfao
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
phulshof
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:31 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 1137 Location:
|
So, I take it you plan to quit or completely rearrange your masteries when the 100 cap comes?
_________________ [88] Vivace Pure INT Bard/Cleric, Bard 88, Cleric 88
[83] Pinokkio Pure INT Force Nuker, Force 83, Cold 83, Lightning 83, Fire 60
[81] Sybian Pure INT KD Nuker, Bicheon 81, Cold 81, Lightning 81, Fire 60
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Stefaab
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:32 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 265 Location: Belgium
|
Backfire wrote: Phaidra wrote: Fire is for Strength Light is for INT
It's that simple really.
Piercing Force and Flame Body are great examples of this. lmfao. Fire is better for ints. Better imbue and better nukes.. And its 18% physical, not 9%, kthx. Give me 3 GOOD reasons that light is better. Please do... The only 1 Im coming up with is increased magical damage. BUT listen to this kids, FIRE nukes are STILL stronger even when light is at 30. omg wut did u say? Yah.. Light nukes are STILL weaker then fire nukes, even if you have an 18% increase. So I take that back... I have 0 reasons to pick light. Also @ the person talking about parry, the parry buffs are increased by a number depending on the level of the buff, not an overall percentage. And like I said... spend a few mil or break apart drops... fix your WHITE stats.... Not THAT hard... I have more parry then most ints with lightening because of my white stats.. I have a friend w/ 30 light who has 420 parry cuz all his white %'s are 61% and everything is 40% blue increase... sooo PLEASE tell me wtf lightening is good for? You guys have obviously never seen a fire nuker pvp'n a light nuker. I rock light users with a +0 spear lmfao. The evidence is out there and you guys are just not reading lmfao Can u please start using textblocks already? i've read every post in this topic except all yours. And on-topic: Light FTW
|
|
Top |
|
 |
piXie_niXie
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:38 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 666 Location:
|
LivithiuM wrote: I do not understand why you think the physical increase from fire is so great for s/s.
You are a pure int char. Your damage comes from magic not physical.
You say you only lose 8% magic damage but recieve 9% physical increase from fire. Ok thats all good but to calculate damage it is all multiplied out.
For starters the physical increase works off the physical damage of your weapon which you should know is very low on a sword but the magical damage on a sword is very high.
Whereas if you had that extra 8% increase from magic it will still be used when you do melee attacks by increasing the damage of your imbue.
I don't agree with your reasoning... mag on sword is the 2nd lowest of all weapons, only blade is lower, and at 10k nuke the extra 8% is only 800 more damage
_________________ Avalon = Big-Brother
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:46 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
Stefaab wrote: Backfire wrote: Phaidra wrote: Fire is for Strength Light is for INT
It's that simple really.
Piercing Force and Flame Body are great examples of this. lmfao. Fire is better for ints. Better imbue and better nukes.. And its 18% physical, not 9%, kthx. Give me 3 GOOD reasons that light is better. Please do... The only 1 Im coming up with is increased magical damage. BUT listen to this kids, FIRE nukes are STILL stronger even when light is at 30. omg wut did u say? Yah.. Light nukes are STILL weaker then fire nukes, even if you have an 18% increase. So I take that back... I have 0 reasons to pick light. Also @ the person talking about parry, the parry buffs are increased by a number depending on the level of the buff, not an overall percentage. And like I said... spend a few mil or break apart drops... fix your WHITE stats.... Not THAT hard... I have more parry then most ints with lightening because of my white stats.. I have a friend w/ 30 light who has 420 parry cuz all his white %'s are 61% and everything is 40% blue increase... sooo PLEASE tell me wtf lightening is good for? You guys have obviously never seen a fire nuker pvp'n a light nuker. I rock light users with a +0 spear lmfao. The evidence is out there and you guys are just not reading lmfao Can u please start using textblocks already? i've read every post in this topic except all yours. And on-topic: Light FTW Probably because either A. you can't handle that fire is better statistically wise or B. you faild Farking english. Learn 2 read... Just because it looks big doesn't mean you cant do it
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:48 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
phulshof wrote: So, I take it you plan to quit or completely rearrange your masteries when the 100 cap comes? *apologies for the double post* What will I need to rearrange? 100 ice, 100 fire, 100 heuksal. Possibly 80 ice / 20 light. Not sure of it now but I will know in a year if I still play this game LoL~
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
AngelMare
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:51 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 639 Location:
|
Quote: And on-topic: Light FTW can u guys stop saying that just like that ? i want explanation why u think it would be better than fire .
_________________


- quit sro.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Backfire
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:53 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 434 Location: USA
|
AngelMare wrote: Quote: And on-topic: Light FTW can u guys stop saying that just like that ? i want explanation why u think it would be better than fire . There is no explanations for their actions.. Just mild retardation I suppose. They have no evidence no proofs no facts.. So yah. Fire IS better, I don't get why every1 thinks light is... Light is fail. Light is 80 cap. This is 90 cap. Get w/ the times
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
phulshof
|
Post subject: Re: why Fire and not Lightning ? Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:00 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 1137 Location:
|
Ok, let's have a look at the numbers then: fire imbue lvl 89: 658~1097 + burn flame wave wide lvl 90: 1060~1766 flame wave bomb lvl 90: 1060~1766
lightning imbue lvl 89: 522~970 + shock piercing force lvl 28: 7% piercing force lvl 88: 18% horse's thunderbolt lvl 86: 876~1627 crane's thunderbolt lvl 90: 989~1837
The % behind the nukes appear to have as much relevance to damage multiplier as to execution time, so I'll ignore them for this example. Damage/second should not be influenced much by it. I'll also assume the damage from burn is about equal to the shock effect.
Damage of 2 fire nukes = (658~1097+1060~1766)*2*107%=3677~6127=4902 on average Damage of 2 lightning nukes = ((522~970+876~1627)+(522~970+989~1837))*118%=3433~6377=4905 on average Note that both numbers are without nuke multipliers.
If you leave lightning at 30, then it comes out slightly weaker than the lightning 90 option. I've noticed though that things rapidly change if you're willing to drop a bit of cold in return for a bit more lightning. It seems that fire 90/bicheon 90/lightning 60/cold60 might be a pretty strong build actually. The problem is of course: what to do with the future caps. If you're planning to quit when the 100 cap arrives, then going fire may not be a bad bet. Otherwise you've got some deleveling to do...
_________________ [88] Vivace Pure INT Bard/Cleric, Bard 88, Cleric 88
[83] Pinokkio Pure INT Force Nuker, Force 83, Cold 83, Lightning 83, Fire 60
[81] Sybian Pure INT KD Nuker, Bicheon 81, Cold 81, Lightning 81, Fire 60
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|