Russia vs Georgia?

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

It's not the weapons that count, but the people that weild them.

Reise · **Joined:** May 2006 **Posts:** 6650 **Location:**

I think you need to research some Russian arms anyway Glenn. They are one of the leading countries in weapons technology.

The Russian military doesn't even use AK47s anymore.

Draquish · **Joined:** Mar 2006 **Posts:** 6423 **Location:** ____

Me wants WW3 plox.

I've been itching for a new Call of Duty.

Jantje · **Posted:** Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:46 pm

We can ourselves.

crazyskwrls · **Joined:** Aug 2007 **Posts:** 2293 **Location:**

jeez give the poor kid a break lol

@ draq, if there is really a ww3 u'll be crying ur ballz off

, and u will be home hoping u can survive long enough to play the new Call of duty

Draquish · **Joined:** Mar 2006 **Posts:** 6423 **Location:** ____

Thats a possibility.

[SD]happynoobing · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2349 **Location:**

GlennNL22 wrote:

Your sukhoi will get blown out of the air by one of the eight Hellfire-missles before it even comes close to the Apache.

fyi hellfire is an air-to-ground missile... you can't hit a fighter jet with a hellfire... apache will only work if the tank column does not have air support. If you are talking about holland vs. Russia, then im sorry but Russia will have air superiority, provided that neither NATO nor US get involved with this.

Pham · **Joined:** Aug 2007 **Posts:** 541 **Location:**

heroo wrote:

It's not the weapons that count, but the people that weild them.

no its the weapon, lets fight, i use a gun, u use a stone.

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

Pham wrote:

heroo wrote:

It's not the weapons that count, but the people that weild them.

no its the weapon, lets fight, i use a gun, u use a stone.

No, it's the people, just because you have good technology doesn't mean you'll win. It's been proven many of times.

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

[SD]happynoobing wrote:

GlennNL22 wrote:

Your sukhoi will get blown out of the air by one of the eight Hellfire-missles before it even comes close to the Apache.

fyi hellfire is an air-to-ground missile... you can't hit a fighter jet with a hellfire... apache will only work if the tank column does not have air support. If you are talking about holland vs. Russia, then im sorry but Russia will have air superiority, provided that neither NATO nor US get involved with this.

Apache's do have air-to-air systems. They don't have the range American ones do.

Doesn't matter anyways, even without air support they will get shot down.

Millenium · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 2732 **Location:** Waterloo

I'm giving the thread another chance on behalf of request. To keep it open you all need to

1) Keep racist comments to minimum, even if its a joke.
2) Keep provokative, profanity and "i ownz all ur fat mom zzzz" comments to yourself
3) Try not to be a flame bait

Warning has been issued to Pixel, and some of you came very VERY close so watch what you're saying. When in doubt EVER if you need to say that shit, chances are, you're probably better off with your mouth shut for the sake of everybody on the forums.

PM me for any problems and I'll explain. If you open useless threads to try to argue with me in my decision or how stupid I'm being or post about how "I'm a fat arse mod she sucks zzz", I will ban you.

cpinney · **Posted:** Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:33 am

so yeah russia pretty much says this whole war is a peacekeeping mission.

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

cpinney wrote:

so yeah russia pretty much says this whole war is a peacekeeping mission.

I could see why they would say that, but it's an internal conflict inside a country that would benefit them if they where to help.

_Scarlett_ · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 1567 **Location:**

Reise wrote:

I think you need to research some Russian arms anyway Glenn. They are one of the leading countries in weapons technology.

The Russian military doesn't even use AK47s anymore.

жаль! The Avtomat Kalashnikova obraztsova 1947 goda, was and still is a reliable arm (so is its several variants). That weapon will work rain, shine, or in the sands of the desert!

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

_Scarlett_ wrote:

Reise wrote:

I think you need to research some Russian arms anyway Glenn. They are one of the leading countries in weapons technology.

The Russian military doesn't even use AK47s anymore.

Халь! The Avtomat Kalashnikova obraztsova 1947 goda, was and still is a reliable arm (so is its several variants). That weapon will work rain, shine, or in the sands of the desert!

It's still used, just not as wide scale as it used to be.

_Scarlett_ · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 1567 **Location:**

X-Lax wrote:

It's still used, just not as wide scale as it used to be.

What I meant; when an arm isn't "used" anymore doesn't necessarily mean it's totally out of service. Who would want to put that weapon to total rest '~,o?

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

_Scarlett_ wrote:

X-Lax wrote:

It's still used, just not as wide scale as it used to be.

What I meant; when an arm isn't "used" anymore doesn't necessarily mean it's totally out of service. Who would want to put that weapon to total rest '~,o?

No one.

Krevidy · **Posted:** Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:46 am

[SD]happynoobing wrote:

GlennNL22 wrote:

Your sukhoi will get blown out of the air by one of the eight Hellfire-missles before it even comes close to the Apache.

fyi hellfire is an air-to-ground missile... you can't hit a fighter jet with a hellfire... apache will only work if the tank column does not have air support. If you are talking about holland vs. Russia, then im sorry but Russia will have air superiority, provided that neither NATO nor US get involved with this.

FYI, Holland is a NATO country. If Holland gets attacked by any country outside the NATO. Other country's nearby Holland will mobilize their forces to defend their own borders to let nothing come to Holland. This is one of the functions of NATO. fyi...

MrH · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 330 **Location:**

Russians are crazy, I'd never want to fu,ck with one.

Jstar1 · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 4757 **Location:**

russia just invaded georgia from the west. I think they are just using this as an excuse to put georgia under control again, hate them.

I Pk I · **Joined:** Jul 2008 **Posts:** 364 **Location:**

I am telling you guys this is just WW3 alot of US allies in Iraw, In south America, now this come on they just gotta name it and thats it.

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

i highly doubt this is a prelude to WW3, WWZ's more likely to happen than WW3

[SD]happynoobing · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 2349 **Location:**

GlennNL22 wrote:

[SD]happynoobing wrote:

GlennNL22 wrote:

Your sukhoi will get blown out of the air by one of the eight Hellfire-missles before it even comes close to the Apache.

fyi hellfire is an air-to-ground missile... you can't hit a fighter jet with a hellfire... apache will only work if the tank column does not have air support. If you are talking about holland vs. Russia, then im sorry but Russia will have air superiority, provided that neither NATO nor US get involved with this.

FYI, Holland is a NATO country. If Holland gets attacked by any country outside the NATO. Other country's nearby Holland will mobilize their forces to defend their own borders to let nothing come to Holland. This is one of the functions of NATO. fyi...

and the Russians know this as well; therefore, they will not take their chances and invade Holland. On the other hand, if Holland unilaterally decided to send and expeditionary force outside of Holland to help Georgia, there is definitely a chance that it will not get any help from NATO. After all, NATO is a defensive treaty.

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

TOloseGT wrote:

i highly doubt this is a prelude to WW3, WWZ's more likely to happen than WW3

ummm... WW3 is possible, WWZ isn't... It's a work of fiction...

Millenium · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 2732 **Location:** Waterloo

cpinney wrote:

so yeah russia pretty much says this whole war is a peacekeeping mission.

Thats what USA says all the time. Its funny what comes out of those politician's mouth

Inuyasha584 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 1491 **Location:**

Reise wrote:

I think you need to research some Russian arms anyway Glenn. They are one of the leading countries in weapons technology.

The Russian military doesn't even use AK47s anymore.

they use ak-74's

Midori · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3425 **Location:**

Inuyasha584 wrote:

Reise wrote:

I think you need to research some Russian arms anyway Glenn. They are one of the leading countries in weapons technology.

The Russian military doesn't even use AK47s anymore.

they use ak-74's

AK-74M to be exact.

cpinney · **Posted:** Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:03 am

Millenium wrote:

cpinney wrote:

so yeah russia pretty much says this whole war is a peacekeeping mission.

Thats what USA says all the time. Its funny what comes out of those politician's mouth

lol? sense when has the USA said that?

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

"saddam hussein is harboring weapons of mass destruction..."

Sharp324 · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 4383 **Location:**

TOloseGT wrote:

"saddam hussein is harboring weapons of mass destruction..."

Hmm...didnt the rest of the worlds Intel agencies think the same?

Lets face it, USA is the best country in the world. Yay! *flys flag*

Silkroad Online Forums

Russia vs Georgia?

Who is online