Silkroad Online Forums

Hmm, if the U.S goes to war with any country led by a crazy man, you might aswell declare war to half of the world.

As for the oil prices, I don't really get your point. But if you mean that the war was declared so you could free the people of Iraq, I doubt it. Anyways, he started the war, so he has contributed to high oil prices in a way.

And for 9/11, no I don't believe he was behind the attack, but I was just saying that he failed as a president by letting those attacks take place.(and you named that as good point) And I also think he failed at helping out people after Katrina.

tasdik stop watching fox news for the love of god.

You should start watching

wow....... does anyone else want to enlighten him or should i?

Oh please "enlighten" me
But tbh I don't really watch much news but what I do watch is foxnews....but I'm also a conservative christen so my judgements are made mostly on that not the news I watch

Hehe, one good advice: keep religion and politics separeted

If you're into something you shouldn't misspell it.

I disagree....I think what you believe determines what you think about politics.


Dang it lol....although I'm actually not a Christian I'm Messianic....http://www.messianicisrael.com

Code: Select all

just type in fox news in youtube and u can see everything u need to know about fox news.

Good example of Faux News.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=128IR21ZQa0

Awww.....fox....why? ....*goes emo*

It doesn't matter if you agree or not but your disagreement shows that you're 1]A republican (me 2 =]) and 2]you haven't been watching the bush administration. Bush's actions towards Iran aren't aggressive, he has taken a "Clintonian" approach to Iran. Kudos to him, he wasn't using common sense in the first 5 years. I guess polls dipping to 17% approval and only going as high as 42% made him realize that no-one likes "Bushanomics" and the prefer a more aggressive "Clintonian" format. Pursue peace at all cost. Pay attention!

FYI: I don't care who wins. Both candidates need to realize that Bush Administration 06-09 does not equal Bush Administration 02-05 and should stop trying to appeal to the Idiotic bunch of retrospective voters that decide the President.

Don't even get me started on Congress.

EDIT: Bush has done some good. It's just the Media doesn't report it, so the Public doesn't notice it, so the feelings towards Bush have declined continuously rather than rise. It's the fact that Politics is not and integral part of American Society; therefore, people don't give a shit if Bush is doing good now because they don't know.
02-05 Bush = Epic Failure.
06-08 He Tried but it all went unnoticed.
09-12 Obama or McCain will win and reverse the actions of 06-08 putting us in a greater slump.

EDIT*2: Most likely Obama will win because people don't like what the Bush Administration is doing atm so they'll just run to the opposite party without thinking about the issues or viewpoints of the candidates. The Hardcore republicans will side with McCain, the Hardcore democrats will side with Obama and the rest will side with Obama simply because he isn't a Republican.

EDIT*3: Obama won't be assassinated. On what basis would they kill him and for what reason do you think Bush is going to go berserk on Iran. Bush has tried to hard to make Iran, India, China, Brazil, and Nigeria our buddies. He isn't going to **** it up because a Democrat is going into Office.

EDIT*4: YOU WATCH FOX?!? Your opinion is now moot.
/thread.

well at least bush is funny, he's got that going for him lol. Definatly not THE worse president in history either, sure he's not good but not THE worst.