[GM] Niferin on Babel

kaperucito · **Joined:** Aug 2008 **Posts:** 308 **Location:** Spain

omier44 wrote:

Omgwut! He said "Dont waste globals on me" wtf. :shock:

Is he gonna get fired?

PIC? XD

BuDo · **Joined:** Dec 2008 **Posts:** 4714 **Location:**

High level players that bot (most of them anyways) put tons of money into this game.....and these GMs know each and every account that is botting......They will ban the gold bots and only warn the player bots with hopes that player bots will stop.....I've never seen a game where they warn you ahead of time about their intentions....

This gives player bots a chance to momentarily quit. Any idiot can see that. Its like a police officer announcing to the entire community in advance that he's gonna patrol by a well known drug corner. Is this how GMs will fight against bots??.

This is lame....Joymax's own incompetence is forcing them to hold on to their main source of income....which are mid-high level gold buying botters. All of us here have already established that over 90% of SRO's "real" player base are botters. Joymax won't remove 90% of SRO's earnings despite our repeated protest. Nothing is going to change.

iscared · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 715 **Location:**

What he says is pretty much the truth and I've known that from the start like many others.

Except the one thing the GMs do not understand is that more people will be buying gold which will just mess up the community if the price drops down low. They need to ban and sue the people who make gold farming sites. They could edit there C.O.S so that it says you aren't allowed to sell ingame items or accounts at all.

Anyone know though if silkroad sounds like it could quite possibly have a decent come back?

Goseki · **Joined:** Apr 2008 **Posts:** 3452 **Location:**

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Fresh · **Posted:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:18 pm

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

What happened to him?

_Dutchy_ · **Posted:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:19 pm

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:04 pm

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

nope, before it was the chinese who started the goldbots. But nowadays, goldbots come from anywhere, any country.

Squirt · **Joined:** Jan 2008 **Posts:** 8186 **Location:**

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

What if they are in America? its possible

Joymax is in California? maybe

Why do you write like this? lol

iscared · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 715 **Location:**

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

and why wouldn't they be able to sue?

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:10 pm

iscared wrote:

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

and why wouldn't they be able to sue?

because chinese are strong, they're gonna own the world

xzaz · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 1574 **Location:**

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

Kurwa

Azilius · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 4236 **Location:** CS:GO

_Equal_ wrote:

ddoouugg wrote:

[
take your witchhunt somewhere else.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=116209&start=0

That is the dumbest rule I've ever seen..

why remain ignorant
:palm:

Disconn3cted · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3293 **Location:** WV, USA

iscared wrote:

_Dutchy_ wrote:

Goseki wrote:

They chose sueing the owner of ECSRO instead of goldselling sites.

Nuff Said.

Most Goldselling sites are in china try sueing them ? its imposible

ECSRO owner was in Poland ? i believe its possible to sue them

and why wouldn't they be able to sue?

They would need the Chinese government to help them and its not going to happen.

Bananaman · **Posted:** Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:05 am

BuDo wrote:

High level players that bot (most of them anyways) put tons of money into this game.....and these GMs know each and every account that is botting......They will ban the gold bots and only warn the player bots with hopes that player bots will stop.....I've never seen a game where they warn you ahead of time about their intentions....

This gives player bots a chance to momentarily quit. Any idiot can see that. Its like a police officer announcing to the entire community in advance that he's gonna patrol by a well known drug corner. Is this how GMs will fight against bots??.

This is lame....Joymax's own incompetence is forcing them to hold on to their main source of income....which are mid-high level gold buying botters. All of us here have already established that over 90% of SRO's "real" player base are botters. Joymax won't remove 90% of SRO's earnings despite our repeated protest. Nothing is going to change.

To fix sro they would need to

1) make it p2p
2) fix the exp and sp rates, and more content to compete with other established p2p games
3) get rid of the item mall
4) make jobbing a LOT more rewarding
5) have more gm support
6)merge servers
7)market the game for new players to join

make a new server so that the new players can play without getting owned by lvl 105 botted older players
9)implement some kind of game protection and bot bannings

Basically turning it into a real game, but...that would be too much work. JM has been milking this cash cow and parting idiots from their money since way back at 60 cap, they have the money do make these changes in a whole week. but its a risk. so untill they start losing massive amounts of money they will leave it as it is. They arent interested in making a great game(at the beginning they were) they are intersted in money, plain and simple.

This is not news folks

xzaz · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 1574 **Location:**

Bananaman wrote:

BuDo wrote:

High level players that bot (most of them anyways) put tons of money into this game.....and these GMs know each and every account that is botting......They will ban the gold bots and only warn the player bots with hopes that player bots will stop.....I've never seen a game where they warn you ahead of time about their intentions....

This gives player bots a chance to momentarily quit. Any idiot can see that. Its like a police officer announcing to the entire community in advance that he's gonna patrol by a well known drug corner. Is this how GMs will fight against bots??.

This is lame....Joymax's own incompetence is forcing them to hold on to their main source of income....which are mid-high level gold buying botters. All of us here have already established that over 90% of SRO's "real" player base are botters. Joymax won't remove 90% of SRO's earnings despite our repeated protest. Nothing is going to change.

To fix sro they would need to

1) make it p2p Not gonna help
2) fix the exp and sp rates, and more content to compete with other established p2p games EXP and Sp is not the problem if you play like it should be played
3) get rid of the item mall And change it with p2p? Nahh
4) make jobbing a LOT more rewarding It is rewarding but everyone is bussy doing their 'own' thing
5) have more gm support They should
6)merge servers Bad solution never do this
7)market the game for new players to join Huh?

make a new server so that the new players can play without getting owned by lvl 105 botted older players Uhh after 2 month you got the same problem
9)implement some kind of game protection and bot bannings There is one: DONT DO IT

Basically turning it into a real game, but...that would be too much work. JM has been milking this cash cow and parting idiots from their money since way back at 60 cap, they have the money do make these changes in a whole week. but its a risk. so untill they start losing massive amounts of money they will leave it as it is. They arent interested in making a great game(at the beginning they were) they are intersted in money, plain and simple.

This is not news folks

BuDo · **Joined:** Dec 2008 **Posts:** 4714 **Location:**

xzaz wrote:

Bananaman wrote:

BuDo wrote:

High level players that bot (most of them anyways) put tons of money into this game.....and these GMs know each and every account that is botting......They will ban the gold bots and only warn the player bots with hopes that player bots will stop.....I've never seen a game where they warn you ahead of time about their intentions....

This gives player bots a chance to momentarily quit. Any idiot can see that. Its like a police officer announcing to the entire community in advance that he's gonna patrol by a well known drug corner. Is this how GMs will fight against bots??.

This is lame....Joymax's own incompetence is forcing them to hold on to their main source of income....which are mid-high level gold buying botters. All of us here have already established that over 90% of SRO's "real" player base are botters. Joymax won't remove 90% of SRO's earnings despite our repeated protest. Nothing is going to change.

To fix sro they would need to

1) make it p2p Not gonna help
2) fix the exp and sp rates, and more content to compete with other established p2p games EXP and Sp is not the problem if you play like it should be played
3) get rid of the item mall And change it with p2p? Nahh
4) make jobbing a LOT more rewarding It is rewarding but everyone is bussy doing their 'own' thing
5) have more gm support They should
6)merge servers Bad solution never do this
7)market the game for new players to join Huh?

make a new server so that the new players can play without getting owned by lvl 105 botted older players Uhh after 2 month you got the same problem
9)implement some kind of game protection and bot bannings There is one: DONT DO IT

Basically turning it into a real game, but...that would be too much work. JM has been milking this cash cow and parting idiots from their money since way back at 60 cap, they have the money do make these changes in a whole week. but its a risk. so untill they start losing massive amounts of money they will leave it as it is. They arent interested in making a great game(at the beginning they were) they are intersted in money, plain and simple.

This is not news folks

None constructive criticism is all you have to offer? Why haven't you provide any explanation behind your "Wont work"...or "Nahh"...and "Huh?"... Those responses aren't reasons as to why these ideas wont fix the game. Those responses are quite moronic. It's like watching a monkey answer some questions.

HuNt3rMx · **Posted:** Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:41 pm

For sure hes gonna be fired, asking ppl not to waste globals which means less income haha..hes justice is for everyone, including the "richs" who have silk hahaha

trusth me, thats not true, thats all im gonna say.

Smi!ezZ · **Joined:** Dec 2008 **Posts:** 558 **Location:** Yukon

omg its a sign from heaven.

xzaz · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 1574 **Location:**

BuDo wrote:

None constructive criticism is all you have to offer? Why haven't you provide any explanation behind your "Wont work"...or "Nahh"...and "Huh?"... Those responses aren't reasons as to why these ideas wont fix the game. Those responses are quite moronic. It's like watching a monkey answer some questions.

I made my opinion and said it many times, keep repeating it is not the solution specialy on this forum. The solution is very simple, due my studie on International Buisness i came across a list of countries that are concentrated on collectivism and on individualism. This game is a game for collectivism and can only be played the way it should be played.
Here isn Europe and America everyone is on their own what so called the individualism. We can say that it is not or fold to cooperate because it just isn't in us. American's are living the dream te become stronger and stronger, with in their mind a voice that says "fck the rest". Europeans only want to get rich and don't care how they do it. And asians play this game because they like to get the goal and work with eachother.
Now don't come to me and say that collectivism is better theb individualism because its not, its just a different way of life.

Silkroad Online Forums

[GM] Niferin on Babel

Who is online