Fate? No, it is not logically feasible. A simple example. Let's say we got a dice. In theory, the chance to get, say, number 4 is roughly 17% (100%/6). Well, we get the number 4, and win a couple of millions. Some would say it was your fate to win; meaning that the other, theoretically possible outcomes (numbers 1,2,3,5,6, the dice being eaten by a dog etc) were not actually possible. That doesn't make sense to me. I don't think either way can be proven thoroughly, very much like the god case. However, i think we shouldn't even need to prove something's (fate's) non-existence in the first place, if there's no actual reason to believe it may exist.
Fate? No, it is not logically feasible. A simple example. Let's say we got a dice. In theory, the chance to get, say, number 4 is roughly 17% (100%/6). Well, we get the number 4, and win a couple of millions. Some would say it was your fate to win; meaning that the other, theoretically possible outcomes (numbers 1,2,3,5,6, the dice being eaten by a dog etc) were not actually possible. That doesn't make sense to me. I don't think either way can be proven thoroughly, very much like the god case. However, i think we shouldn't even need to prove something's (fate's) non-existence in the first place, if there's no actual reason to believe it may exist.
Calculations have to do with chance, and chance is the opposite of fate. Fate is the belief that everything happens because it was meant to, and as such there's no other possible outcomes for any instance. Ultimately, fate would mean that you're actually not in control of your actions, but just follow a path that's been set before you.
How would you explain for example dying when playing russian roulette? That it was your fate, and had nothing to do with chance? Pff, the whole game is about chance.
What would cause such a thing as "fate"? A god that's written a manuscript for the whole universe and all instances that occur all the time? I recon no logical reasons can be presented to support, let alone prove the existence of "fate" or "destiny". Superstitious nonsense.
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 5185 Location: Artists Corner
@Shadow:
Wouldnt the theory that theres an infinite amount of universes where every possible outcome plays out in another universe (wasnt it Einstein that suggested this?) mean that fate does exist?
Or if you look at it in another way.
Whatever happens in the future will happen unless we know how that future came to be.
So with the dice example, if in the future you rolled a five, you will still roll a five unless you knew how you rolled that five to start off with.
So unless we can travel through time I can safely assume that since the future exists, I cant change it without knowing how that future came to be.
Calculations have to do with chance, and chance is the opposite of fate. Fate is the belief that everything happens because it was meant to, and as such there's no other possible outcomes for any instance. Ultimately, fate would mean that you're actually not in control of your actions, but just follow a path that's been set before you.
How would you explain for example dying when playing russian roulette? That it was your fate, and had nothing to do with chance? Pff, the whole game is about chance.
What would cause such a thing as "fate"? A god that's written a manuscript for the whole universe and all instances that occur all the time? I recon no logical reasons can be presented to support, let alone prove the existence of "fate" or "destiny". Superstitious nonsense.
Yes, even a game of Russian roulette is fate.. we like to think we have a choice, thats a human thing, but we have not. Like it is my fait to write this.
And for you second part, for me its a God for someone it is destiny..
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
How about thinking of a 'God' in terms of 'The Order of Destiny'? However random destiny or fate might seem, what if there is a pattern we haven't been able to discover yet? What about a pattern in pi, or in ivy leaves?
EDIT: Watch the movies 'A Beautiful Mind' and 'Pi' if you're interested in things like these.
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
How about thinking of a 'God' in terms of 'The Order of Destiny'? However random destiny or fate might seem, what if there is a pattern we haven't been able to discover yet? What about a pattern in pi, or in ivy leaves?
EDIT: Watch the movies 'A Beautiful Mind' and 'Pi' if you're interested in things like these.
Yep, but then again who created the Patern... ah this is filosophy... you can go on for ages
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
xzaz wrote:
Stress wrote:
How about thinking of a 'God' in terms of 'The Order of Destiny'? However random destiny or fate might seem, what if there is a pattern we haven't been able to discover yet? What about a pattern in pi, or in ivy leaves?
EDIT: Watch the movies 'A Beautiful Mind' and 'Pi' if you're interested in things like these.
Yep, but then again who created the Patern... ah this is filosophy... you can go on for ages
The Pattern is inherent to everything.
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
How about thinking of a 'God' in terms of 'The Order of Destiny'? However random destiny or fate might seem, what if there is a pattern we haven't been able to discover yet? What about a pattern in pi, or in ivy leaves?
EDIT: Watch the movies 'A Beautiful Mind' and 'Pi' if you're interested in things like these.
Yep, but then again who created the Patern... ah this is filosophy... you can go on for ages
The Pattern is inherent to everything.
Who dangerous word 'everything' define everything.. what we can see?
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4599 Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
@xzaz Good question. Let me answer with a question of my own. We know things that we cannot be aware of, 'see' in any way, must exist. For example, dark matter, or such things. If some things weren't there, the universe could never work. We are aware of this, but we have no clue of what those things really are.
Now, onto my point. If things we cannot 'see' in any way have to exist, isn't it safe to suppose, that there is a possibility that a lot of other things might exist, which we cannot 'see' in any way? This is 'everything', in my opinion. All that has ever existed, exists now, and will ever exist, wether we 'see' it or not.
_________________ Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum