The solution to the crowded servers

curixq · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 35 **Location:** ouig

Some years ago I played knightonline but pfft it I didn't like it. BUT they have a good server system.
It is simple, instea of one server Athens, Sparta, etc etc, why can't you make 3 of them? Like: Athens1 Athens2 Athens3 and Sparta1 Sparta2 Sparta3 (and the other servers)
The people who made an character on the Athens server should be able to play also with the same character on the other Athens server. (and talk with their friends and guild on the other 2 "servers)
The number of players then is divided into 3... so less people.

That's all I want to say.

Sharp324 · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 4383 **Location:**

But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...

deep.in · **Posted:** Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Sharp324 wrote:

But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...

I don't see JM doing smth on sro at all...

TaicaCuu · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 204 **Location:** OTL

Sharp324 wrote:

But i really dont see JM spending much money on iSRO...

Exactly

ilovetibet · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 94 **Location:** sfgas

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

HertogJan · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 1063 **Location:**

Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.

athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights

Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.

Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.

satman83 · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 9541 **Location:** London

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha :roll:

urtoasty · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 363

HertogJan wrote:

Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.

athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights

Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.

Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.

that might be able to work. they just need to start doing it. They need to start making special servers...for people over 20+.

Zero_Doom · **Joined:** Jul 2006 **Posts:** 1572 **Location:**

I like the game to be put into one server each. There are some issues with 3 different servers, one for each thing. Like, if someone kses me, I can't taunt them to try and kill me or pvp me, or w/e. I can't instantly log off the grinding server and go into pvp/jobbing, I would probably have to sit and wait for one of the millions of bots to log off.

It would be a better idea to increase server's maximum capacity, and to actually turn on gamegaurd. I hear that kSRO won't even turn on if there are edits to the pk2 files, or if there is a bot program running. And it has the same gamegaurd thing going, maybe thats the reason we have so many bots.

ilovetibet · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 94 **Location:** sfgas

satman83 wrote:

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha :roll:

i read about it in the ksro news

Sharp324 · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 4383 **Location:**

satman83 wrote:

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha :roll:

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

wuahahhah1 BILLION lol, they wish... -.-

TwelveEleven · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 3806 **Location:** Heaven

It prolly aint profit...

It can very well be that they 'made' 1 billion out of iSro.

YourDaddy · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 61

Quote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

Did you know the word "Gullible" isn't in the dictionary? :roll:

And fyi, there's a big difference between "I read it in the korean news" and "I read it on a forum that's predominately 12-16 yr olds".

Sharp324 · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 4383 **Location:**

TwelveEleven wrote:

It prolly aint profit...

It can very well be that they 'made' 1 billion out of iSro.

was about to say the same, yeah probably isnt their profit but the total money they made before they took out expenses

mushrooms · **Joined:** Dec 2006 **Posts:** 675 **Location:**

Sharp324 wrote:

satman83 wrote:

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha :roll:

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.

Dude, even Harry Potter doesn't make that much. How the heck would this make anymore?

satman83 · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 9541 **Location:** London

mushrooms wrote:

Sharp324 wrote:

satman83 wrote:

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

hahahh where the f**k did you here that they made 1billion...lol do you
really think that they made that much??? hahaha :roll:

world wide it is possible to make 1 billion.

Dude, even Harry Potter doesn't make that much. How the heck would this make anymore?

lol..i think "yourdaddy" sums it up nicely

YourDaddy wrote:

Did you know the word "Gullible" isn't in the dictionary? :roll:

And fyi, there's a big difference between "I read it in the korean news" and "I read it on a forum that's predominately 12-16 yr olds".

lol...just because you read something on the internet doesnt make
it true ok

StealMySoda · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 5245 **Location:**

Ive got an idea.
BAN BOTS ^^

PsYch008 · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4451 **Location:** reno

we arent denying that joynax makes plenty of money, we are denying their willingness to change the game.

skyduck · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 74 **Location:**

Better solutions... I think...

- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.

blahhhhhO_o · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 101 **Location:**

skyduck wrote:

Better solutions... I think...

- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.

the second and third idea r terible

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

blahhhhhO_o wrote:

skyduck wrote:

Better solutions... I think...

- Ban all bots.
- Restrict char levels for stalling in town.
- Limit the number of connections from same IP.
- Introduce auction house to reduce afk stall chars.

the second and third idea r terible

Why is the second idea terrible? Why should you need to have the ability to stall at lvl 1? It doesn't take very long at all to get to level 5 or even 10. So if you create a character and get a really nice drop at lvl 2 (I doubt it) then just wait a day or so until you get to lvl 10 and stall that drop.

Level 1 characters really don't need to be stalling at all. There's no real reason that I can see.

As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.

skyduck · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 74 **Location:**

Okay, I agree the 3rd idea was bad... I haven't thought about internet cafes and universities and stuffs.

and to clarify the 2nd idea I meant for example in order to stall in say Hotan,
the stall character has to be say level 50 or higher.
Then, you won't see all those level 1 char stalls packing every inch in Hotan.

Innovacious · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 2446 **Location:**

ilovetibet wrote:

ksro got 1m from the game and isro got 1bilion from the game,so why they dont want to do that??? eam eam joymax biatch eam eam

this was proven wrong already, the person who translated it had absolutley no idea what he was on about.

Vandango · **Joined:** Jun 2006 **Posts:** 4143 **Location:**

PR0METHEUS wrote:

As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.

that would also Eradicate clientless farming due to the program being on a server 1 server same IP i think

1 server can carry like 50 bots at a time

BaronSengir · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 654 **Location:** Earth

they should indeed cut the stalling to auction house damn people covering every corner in hotan and covering up the npcs its pretty damn annoying

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

Karlos Vandango wrote:

PR0METHEUS wrote:

As for limiting the number of connections from the same IP, I agree they should not do that. That would really limit places like Internet cafes and Universities and the like.

that would also Eradicate clientless farming due to the program being on a server 1 server same IP i think

1 server can carry like 50 bots at a time

Yes but that's not really a solution to the bot problem (I know that's not what this thread's about). Solve that problem by preventing them from logging in, not by blocking groups of IPs that DO log in clientless.

If you block multiple logins from the same IP, you're potentially preventing a LOT of silk-buying legit players who happen to be at universities or internet cafes or the like.... all in the name of blocking some bots who will just change their IP.

truez · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 1288 **Location:**

HertogJan wrote:

Wouldnt work, expect if you made different servers for different things.

athens1: grinding
athens2: jobbing
athens3: capefights

Or something like that, otherwise almost all people would still go to one server. What fun is there to be in a guild and be devided over different servers? Everybody will go to one server anyways. I would follow most of my guildies, all our union guilds would come, same will happen with other guild and unions. Wich means crowded server FTW.

Why do you think they are launching new servers? Besides for the extra moneyz.

This wuldnt be possible.... Ppl wit gold tickets wuld grind for 3 hrs ... at other times they try to do some jobs or cap fights..... so most of time ..ppl are grinding

Silkroad Online Forums

The solution to the crowded servers

Who is online