Just an idea....

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

afk for 30-60 mins=dc from server.
Bots=ban ip perm
All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

A few rules like these would solve SO Many problems

Pietje · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 281 **Location:**

[quote="mastersamsam"][color=red]just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

well there will be some people that come back after 1.59 hour and go train, are reset the stall

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

mmm ok alter that part abit, tho the rest is pritty usefull, id be able to log into sro instantly.

DarkJackal · **Joined:** Feb 2006 **Posts:** 6119 **Location:** A den~

mastersamsam wrote:

just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

afk for 30-60 mins=dc from server.
Bots=ban ip perm
All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

A few rules like these would solve SO Many problems

They wont do anything about helping ppl log in EVER because then theres less motivation to buy a premium ticket and give them money, its just how they want it, so unless you are gonna by one sometime ya got nothin to look forward to for logging in.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

the fun -.-

Ow well, looks like ill just leave sro till euro and see if thts any different. sro admin/w.e need to start thinking about all members not just ones who are getting them a profit.

MERC · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 11 **Location:**

mastersamsam wrote:

just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

afk for 30-60 mins=dc from server.
Bots=ban ip perm
All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

A few rules like these would solve SO Many problems

afk for 30-60 mins = dc. sounds good

permanent bot ip ban. would do nothing (you can change your ip in a matter of seconds)

all stallers get dc after 2hrs. bad idea (in my opinion would mess up the economy)

Ell · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 3281 **Location:**

I seriously doubt Joymax would start caring about whether you can log in or not because as long as they have players(obviously they do since servers are always so full) they'll be happy enough and logging in is your problem.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

my pcs fine, its the sro servers full 24/7/. Making them bigger could help.

/Pi · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 4592 **Location:**

mastersamsam wrote:

just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

afk for 30-60 mins=dc from server.
Bots=ban ip perm
All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

A few rules like these would solve SO Many problems

What about dynamic IP addresses?

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

MERC wrote:

mastersamsam wrote:

just a though, some new rules that should be applied to sro to get rid of all the lame lag and 10 years of trying to actully log on.

afk for 30-60 mins=dc from server.
Bots=ban ip perm
All Stallers get dced after 2 hrs. (has to have stall open for 2 hrs)

A few rules like these would solve SO Many problems

afk for 30-60 mins = dc. sounds good

permanent bot ip ban. would do nothing (you can change your ip in a matter of seconds)

all stallers get dc after 2hrs. bad idea (in my opinion would mess up the economy)

<-- wow some ppl wouldnt sell items as quick :o means actully logging on i wouldnt care tbo.

Ell · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 3281 **Location:**

Go post in official forums then? I doubt they'll even respond to you though. Best you can do is to suck it up, and either deal with it or quit.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

ill go with the quit option tbo, i just cba to try 20 times to long oneach time, ill just stay with gw+other games tht i can 'log' on to

Ell · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 3281 **Location:**

Guild wars was fun, pvp actually took a lot of skill.

BuddahBless · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 998 **Location:**

They should just improve their service and make the game p2p. :/ That would fix alot of the problems.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

if it was purely p2p they would lose like 10,000 members? if not more. and some of them 'now and then' buy silk.

And gw pvp is easy if u got the right build :roll:

MERC · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 11 **Location:**

BuddahBless wrote:

They should just improve their service and make the game p2p. :/ That would fix alot of the problems.

LOL! id think they could improve it now since they are making aprox. 20,000+ USD a month per server on silk alone.

Hawkster · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 229 **Location:**

as long as Silkroad has a reputation for servers full nearly 24/7 Joymax don't care about 1 out of a Million players thinks.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

they should spend like 1k cash on like updating servers so they can hold x10 more ppl

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

Hawkster wrote:

as long as Silkroad has a reputation for servers full nearly 24/7 Joymax don't care about 1 out of a Million players thinks.

if u look threw forums ull find like a couple of thousand of ppl getting anoyed with the same problem

uBeR · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 966 **Location:**

Dynamic IP address won't do squat if you're banned via MAC address. Whether Joymax is anything beyond a group of amateur game makers to realize this, I doubt. Whether Joymax actually wants to ban botters permanently, lest premium ticket sales go down, I doubt. Joymax is a profit maximizing company like any other; if they can keep severs full, whether by bots or by players, if it means someone will buy a $20 ticket, they're happy as can be. On Babel, I would argue there are more bots than legitimate players. This is fine, according to morningdrew and Joymax.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

uBeR wrote:

Dynamic IP address won't do squat if you're banned via MAC address. Whether Joymax is anything beyond a group of amateur game makers to realize this, I doubt. Whether Joymax actually wants to ban botters permantly, less premium ticket sales go down, I doubt. Joymax is a profit maximizing company like any other; if they can keep severs full, whether by bots or by players, if it means someone will buy a $20 ticket, they're happy as can be. On Babel, I would argue there are more bots than legitimate players. This is fine, according to morningdrew and Joymax.

Yeah jm dont care about the real players they just want the moola [cash] :banghead:

_Shinigami_ · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 2191 **Location:**

i like those ideas

uBeR · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 966 **Location:**

Trust me, it's not the stallers that are the problem anymore (or the afkers, for that matter).

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

_Shinigami_ wrote:

i like those ideas

ty lol, most ppl only like 1 of them.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

uBeR wrote:

Trust me, it's not the stallers that are the problem anymore (or the afkers, for that matter).

ud be supprised, its stallers+botters tht take up like 3/4 of the servers

boast · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 477 **Location:**

what kinda money does joymax earn when 1/3rd of the servers are gold botters? All those gold botters could instead be silk-paying players, if they could log in.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

boast wrote:

what kinda money does joymax earn when 1/3rd of the servers are gold botters? All those gold botters could instead be silk-paying players, if they could log in.

they are making enough money so they dont care. they <3 botters

Hawkster · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 229 **Location:**

mastersamsam wrote:

Hawkster wrote:

as long as Silkroad has a reputation for servers full nearly 24/7 Joymax don't care about 1 out of a Million players thinks.

if u look threw forums ull find like a couple of thousand of ppl getting anoyed with the same problem

i am talking about his idea not the crowded servers >.<

if the GM's had a complain PM box it would be full within a day.

mastersamsam · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 21

Hawkster wrote:

mastersamsam wrote:

Hawkster wrote:

as long as Silkroad has a reputation for servers full nearly 24/7 Joymax don't care about 1 out of a Million players thinks.

if u look threw forums ull find like a couple of thousand of ppl getting anoyed with the same problem

i am talking about his idea not the crowded servers >.<

if the GM's had a complain PM box it would be full within a day.

True, thts y they need to recruit like 200 more gms per server and then we will be bot free!!! for 10 seconds

BlackFox · **Posted:** Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:04 pm

NO yours BLAHBLAH idea is only Stupid ,annyoing and Be not at all online game . I dont belive someone want play the game then and Nothing be solved ,

Silkroad Online Forums

Just an idea....

Who is online