|
|
Silkroad Online
|
|
Silkroad Forums
|
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
the_wicked
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:10 am |
|
| Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 3820 Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
|
|
IMO, they wouldn't even be used if it was that way around...Everyone would be used to euro lvling speed and party based pvp...not 1v1'ing....also, solo grinding < party grinding
_________________

|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Nader
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:18 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 1591 Location:
|
the_wicked wrote: IMO, they wouldn't even be used if it was that way around...Everyone would be used to euro lvling speed and party based pvp...not 1v1'ing....also, solo grinding < party grinding theyd be used mostly because of the no pot delay,
_________________

Post #666 was posted on Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:58 am
 Cin ^^
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jabbers
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:20 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 1674 Location: la revolucion
|
everyone would be plvling chinese characters and crying about "ohh they've no pot delay!! no fair!" and pure str bows would dominate. 
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jabbers
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:20 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 1674 Location: la revolucion
|
everyone would be plvling chinese characters and crying about "ohh they've no pot delay!! no fair!" and pure str bows would dominate. 
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
the_wicked
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:20 am |
|
| Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 3820 Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
|
Nader wrote: the_wicked wrote: IMO, they wouldn't even be used if it was that way around...Everyone would be used to euro lvling speed and party based pvp...not 1v1'ing....also, solo grinding < party grinding theyd be used mostly because of the no pot delay, True...But i don't see any euro party grinder going through the solo grind / farm nightmare of chinese. double post FTL
_________________

|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Nader
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:23 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 1591 Location:
|
the_wicked wrote: Nader wrote: the_wicked wrote: IMO, they wouldn't even be used if it was that way around...Everyone would be used to euro lvling speed and party based pvp...not 1v1'ing....also, solo grinding < party grinding theyd be used mostly because of the no pot delay, True...But i don't see any euro party grinder going through the solo grind / farm nightmare of chinese. double post FTL euros need alot of farming also. gheez a full rogue with cleric sub needs 750k sp for 90cap, so theyd need to be farmed, and instead of us pfarming euros, wed just be pfarming chinese.. oh wait we already do XD
_________________

Post #666 was posted on Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:58 am
 Cin ^^
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
HawaiianMix
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:26 am |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 786 Location:
|
Nader wrote: the_wicked wrote: IMO, they wouldn't even be used if it was that way around...Everyone would be used to euro lvling speed and party based pvp...not 1v1'ing....also, solo grinding < party grinding theyd be used mostly because of the no pot delay, Yes, and people would complain that Chinese are unfair. I believe what would be different would be the usage of masteries. If euro came out first, I think that people would probably use chinese more in party way. The reason I say this is because if you play chinese as if they were in a party you would need less masteries and might even see more people using force. But that is my personal opinion as I believe that you are not suppose to have ever skill since I think this game is party based, not solo.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
the_wicked
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:27 am |
|
| Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 3820 Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
|
Nader wrote: text Well, its much easier to farm in an organized euro party than it is soloing as a chinese....thats a fact.
_________________

|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Sylhana
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:38 am |
|
| Banned User |
 |
Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 3467 Location:
|
the_wicked wrote: Nader wrote: text Well, its much easier to farm in an organized euro party than it is soloing as a chinese....thats a fact. It isnt always that easy to find an organized euro party. By farming, you place your chars progress at a different pace to your party mates. So much so you will be outleveled in time. Finding the right players at your level to continue farming would sooner or later be a problem. Unless you were thinking of farming at close to cap lvl, in which case chinese chars have access to as well (since all char types merge at takla).
_________________ <<banned from SRF for bot support. -SG>>
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
_Scarlett_
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:44 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 1567 Location:
|
|
Well, since euro parties have become more popular (still can't find any on Oasis...guess most of 'em are getting pLvled) chinese chars are even share pting it up. But yeah, share pting with strangers can be disasterous if the pt is unorganized.
_________________

Quote: We should stop treating people like objects, or at least treat our objects with more respect.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
_Angels
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:23 am |
|
| Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 707 Location:
|
|
imo not much changed. best build now to use atm are pure str bladers or bow cuz of the new skills like knock back of bow and debuffs of bladers. unless u got sun loli
_________________ << banned on request. -cin >>
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
-.-
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:28 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 1921 Location: http://goo.gl/Lfwa
|
|
if euro came out first i think people wouldn't have botted so much :S with 15 second delay gold farmers wouldn't have gotten so bad either lol
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Nader
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:49 am |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 1591 Location:
|
-.- wrote: if euro came out first i think people wouldn't have botted so much :S with 15 second delay gold farmers wouldn't have gotten so bad either lol it would be the same., when your lvl 64 and can 1hit a 57 (sonar) and get gold you wouldnt need to pot as much.
_________________

Post #666 was posted on Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:58 am
 Cin ^^
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ArchYourFace
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:46 pm |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 638 Location:
|
|
I think I see what youre getting at, and I believe that it should have been done that way. Could you imagine an 8 man chinese party. Get a bow man pulling, a B/S tanking, a couple of nukers power bombing mobs, and a ressing healing/cursing vital spot character, and just fill in the gaps as needed. I look at the euros and envy the system of battle and working together. I just wish it would be harnessed rather than lead to the soloing frustrating plvling phenomenon that’s going on now. I cant even make a decent euro (wizard at least) on my server without plvl. Cause there is no parties, just begging, previously chinese noobs.
Ok I started pointlessly rambling.
But I think peoples views would be 10 times better if they saw chinese as euros, and played accoringly.
_________________ Not many Ninja's exist today, yet they all have indomitable fighting skills as a part of Ninjitsu [TankMePlease] - [Ninjitsu] - [Venus]
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
PureStr
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:47 pm |
|
| Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 1244 Location: GTA5
|
|
What i'd love to see Is an euro only sro.
_________________
[Epic Beard Man] wrote: You gonna get a Vietnam now mother, and i whipped his butt so fast and so quick, so pretty. I hit him with the Muhammad Ali left, right, left. I did the Ali shuffle! _ Diablo 3 GuyLafleur - 60 (54) - Wizz
GTA5
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
DrTommy
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:06 pm |
|
| Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 8
|
|
I\'ve thought about that before.
Even though i like chinese a bit more than euro, I wish the game started like this.
I would rather have less pot delay, and more strategic skills. It would make it a more class-based mmo, something that thisgame lacks.
Euros could have been a lot more popular, even after chinese, if they were developed a bit better.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
BuddahBless
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:22 pm |
|
| Banned User |
 |
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 998 Location:
|
|
Euros are more fun to play than chinese so I wouldn't mind them coming first at all. I would still make a chinese char, just to experience the new low pot delay. But I don't think I would stick with it.
If the game started off as euro only I think we would be better off now as far as bots. It's hard to bot euro chars and if it was euro only, I don't think they would have even started with the botting thing.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
NuclearSilo
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:25 pm |
|
| Forum God |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Age of Wushu
|
|
A huge change is that programmers begin to make BOT when chinese come out. As euro, the bot dont know how to play in party, pot delay kick their ass. Chinese is a total failure of the game.
_________________ Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
-.-
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:17 pm |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 1921 Location: http://goo.gl/Lfwa
|
Nader wrote: -.- wrote: if euro came out first i think people wouldn't have botted so much :S with 15 second delay gold farmers wouldn't have gotten so bad either lol it would be the same., when your lvl 64 and can 1hit a 57 (sonar) and get gold you wouldnt need to pot as much. they have to get to 64 first... lol and bots would mostly be warriors or clerics... using wizard/rogue the bots would lvl slower since they cant fight higher mobs since they cant use subs i think
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Fly
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:22 pm |
|
| Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 2114 Location:
|
|
u guys r funny. your idea of a euro: full rogue with cleric sub.
if euro was released 1st then chinese, srf would not be full of whackjobs playing euro chars like a chinese chars and stuck in a chinese frame of mind. euros would be played correctly.
_________________ Fly; lvl 90 s/s Warrior & LvL 6 Hunter [Avalon * Hero]
 Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ArchYourFace
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:30 pm |
|
| Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 638 Location:
|
Fly wrote: u guys r funny. your idea of a euro: full rogue with cleric sub.
if euro was released 1st then chinese, srf would not be full of whackjobs playing euro chars like a chinese chars and stuck in a chinese frame of mind. euros would be played correctly. exactly, and so would chinese. People probably wouldnt spread their skills over 3-4 masteries to compensate, cause they would have the party mentality. just cause they CAN solo doesnt mean they should. they SHOULD have 2 masteries and learn to work togther.
_________________ Not many Ninja's exist today, yet they all have indomitable fighting skills as a part of Ninjitsu [TankMePlease] - [Ninjitsu] - [Venus]
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Da_Realest
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:31 pm |
|
| Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2435 Location:
|
|
I wouldn't be playing. I only play SRO because its pretty much the only MMO where you can be a one man army. To me, Euro is just a nice break from the usual format.
Also what Fly said. Euros would be played correctly. Most Euros don't get subs to help in party play, but as a poor attempt to make their character into a one man army, a Chinese character.
_________________
Ziegfried wrote: What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
yuge07
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:08 pm |
|
| Casual Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 54 Location:
|
|
first i think the name of this game would be europeonline instead of silkroad online. second the point of play sro is to enjoy its unique chinese character if i want to play eupro char there are plenty of other games better than sro.this is just my point of the view tho. chinese FTW
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ThisIsAvalon
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:21 pm |
|
| Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 1163 Location:
|
|
Change is slow. That said, everyone would stick to their euro and only use their chinese char for entertainment, not real pvp. But, if china came out AFTER euro, they would have made them 2x stronger, because really the only reason they made euro overpowered is to get more people to play their shit dying game.... So you would see chinese charactors taking down full euro 8 man parties alone...
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
shoto
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:33 pm |
|
| Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 1459 Location:
|
|
i wonder if the bot problem would be as bad...if euro was first. personally i would complain that chinese had such cool looking skills
ontop of that all the people that are now complaining that euro is too strong will say the same for chinese. 'OMG Chinese aren't as strong as Euro but they have no pot delay!!! how can we win!!'
_________________
Mysterious Death Desert
Mysterious desert that causes mysterious deaths
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RogueKiller
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:36 pm |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1893 Location:
|
|
I would think the bot problem would be starting just when they would introduce the chinese. Because with the pot delay of euros i bet the botting with a euro is impossible. I personally dont know anything about euros though.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
huejas
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:20 pm |
|
| Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1804 Location:
|
-.- wrote: if euro came out first i think people wouldn't have botted so much :S with 15 second delay gold farmers wouldn't have gotten so bad either lol That what i was going to say...there wouldnt be so many farking gold bots and shit But anyways like ppl said b4, i think that everyone would be amazed with the no pot delay and all capped euro's would make a chinese just like all the capped chinese made a euro now.
_________________


|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Nyahgis
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:18 am |
|
| Banned User |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 680 Location:
|
Da_Realest wrote: I wouldn't be playing. I only play SRO because its pretty much the only MMO where you can be a one man army. To me, Euro is just a nice break from the usual format.
Also what Fly said. Euros would be played correctly. Most Euros don't get subs to help in party play, but as a poor attempt to make their character into a one man army, a Chinese character. I think subs play in a lot better than I keep on seeing done. Especially on the older servers. The reason I double subbed wasn't so I could be a one man army, but rather that I would be more flexible in a chinese dominated server. Besides, something as simple as a cleric sub [for ressing, blessing alone], is more than useful for a sub... A euro party with fully subbed characters might not necessarily do a lot better than a single mastery party, since the euro party functions so well just because of the euro specialization, but knowing that we have back up blesses or resses in case everything goes to hell, is a lot more comforting. Besides, you can't always get together the perfect party. Having the ability to switch around is nice.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Da_Realest
|
Post subject: Re: Rethinking Silkroad, an alternate perspective Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:48 am |
|
| Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2435 Location:
|
Nyahgis wrote: Da_Realest wrote: I wouldn't be playing. I only play SRO because its pretty much the only MMO where you can be a one man army. To me, Euro is just a nice break from the usual format.
Also what Fly said. Euros would be played correctly. Most Euros don't get subs to help in party play, but as a poor attempt to make their character into a one man army, a Chinese character. I think subs play in a lot better than I keep on seeing done. Especially on the older servers. The reason I double subbed wasn't so I could be a one man army, but rather that I would be more flexible in a chinese dominated server. Besides, something as simple as a cleric sub [for ressing, blessing alone], is more than useful for a sub... A euro party with fully subbed characters might not necessarily do a lot better than a single mastery party, since the euro party functions so well just because of the euro specialization, but knowing that we have back up blesses or resses in case everything goes to hell, is a lot more comforting. Besides, you can't always get together the perfect party. Having the ability to switch around is nice. That is comparable to the reasons why I got Cleric sub for my Warlock. There is a lack of Euros so Recovery Division helps out when I solo. In case a party situation does arise, I can be a full time Cleric or Warlock depending on what would benefit the party the most. Skills that only have effects on me are nice, but I also considered how a particular sub could benefit a party before I made a decision.
Again, sure subs help out in a group situations, but thats not the reason why most Euros get them. Its to help them only. The fact that Warlock debuffs benefit everyone attacking that opponent and Bless Spell covers the whole party is just a bonus for them. Some of them would still get those type of skills even if it only effected them.
_________________
Ziegfried wrote: What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|